Objective: To determine the accuracy of the microscopic diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis (presence of [pseudo] hyphae and blastospores) in stained vaginal smears in clinical practice.
Study Design: General practitioners trained in diagnosing vulvovaginal candidiasis performed microscopy of 324 stained vaginal smears. These smears were sent to the pathologist for confirmation of the microscopic diagnosis of the clinician; cytologic diagnosis by the pathologist was considered the gold standard.
The advantage of studying the vaginal flora to determine the bacteria and fungi present in cervical smears (as opposed to cultivation of these micro-organisms) is that the micro-organisms can be observed in their natural habitat. However, they are only faintly stained by the conventional Papanicolaou method. Accordingly, contrast is weak and visualization poor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF