Resistance to sliding of orthodontic brackets with bumps in the slot floors and walls: effects of second-order angulation.

Objective: Two stainless steel (SS) bracket designs with two bumps across the slot floors and rounded slot walls and one polycrystalline alumina (PCA) bracket design with one bump along the slot floor were compared to conventional SS and PCA brackets.

Methods: For each design, the resistances to sliding of four archwire-bracket couples, two in the dry state and two in the wet (saliva) state, were measured at 32 second-order angles between -12 and +12 degrees.

Results: When clearances existed, the kinetic coefficients of friction of the SS brackets ranged from 0.

Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.

Rectangular stainless steel (SS) archwires were coupled with four SS bracket designs: Mini Diamond Twin, which was a conventional twin bracket; VersaT, which had bumps along the slot floor and rounded slot walls; Shoulder, which had bosses outside the tie-wings to lift the ligation off the archwire; and Synergy, which had bosses between the outer and inner tie-wings, bumps along the slot floor, and rounded slot walls. For all designs, the values of resistance to sliding (RS) were measured at five normal forces and 32 second-order angulations in the dry and wet (saliva) states. RS values at these same angles and states were also measured for the following: Mini Diamond Twin brackets ligated with rings and SS ligature wires; VersaT brackets ligated with rings; Shoulder brackets ligated with rings in a figure-8 and a figure-O around the tie-wings; and Synergy brackets ligated with rings around the outer tie-wings and around the inner tie-wings.

Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state.

When paired with a particular self-ligating bracket design, the material and the geometric characteristics of an archwire influence its resistance to sliding. Four designs of self-ligating brackets (1 with a slide, 3 with clips) were coupled with 5 types of archwires: 14-mil round austenitic nickel-titanium, 16 x 22-mil rectangular austenitic nickel-titanium, 19 x 25-mil rectangular austenitic nickel-titanium, 19 x 25-mil rectangular martensitic nickel-titanium, and 19 x 25-mil rectangular stainless steel. The resistance to sliding (RS) of each archwire-bracket couple was measured at second-order angles between -9 degrees and 9 degrees.

Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states.

Resistance to sliding was investigated for 3 self-ligating brackets having passive slides and 3 self-ligating brackets having active clips. Four of these products are currently marketed, and 2 are of historic interest. For all cases, an 0.