Purpose: To report the outcomes of PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in presbyopic commercial and military pilots requiring Class 1 aeromedical certification.
Methods: This was a retrospective study of 23 consecutive pilots who underwent PRESBYOND Laser Blended Vision LASIK. Postoperative visits were conducted at 1 day and 1, 3, and 12 months.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia in a large population of young adults.
Methods: In this retrospective case series, the patient population consisted of the first 4,138 consecutive SMILE treatments using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between 2012 and 2018 at the London Vision Clinic. Inclusion criteria were myopic spherical equivalent up to -9.
Purpose: To report subjective and objective quality of vision (QoV) results for high myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) between -9.00 and -13.00 diopters (D).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To report the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia between -9.00 and -14.00 diopters (D).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cataract Refract Surg
September 2021
Purpose: To describe a new technique for identifying the upper (cap) interface during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). If the lower interface is dissected first it can be challenging to locate the cap interface and complete the lenticule separation.
Setting: London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom.
J Cataract Refract Surg
April 2020
Two cases of epithelial implantation after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) treated by Nd:YAG laser and interface sweeping are described. A 40-year-old woman and 33-year-old man underwent SMILE and subsequently were noted to have epithelial cells implanted into the surgical interface. One case was treated using Nd:YAG laser.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To describe a femtosecond laser-assisted small incision sutureless intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty in an eye with severe keratoconus and report on the outcome with a 1-year follow-up.
Methods: A 20-year-old man with a history of keratoconus presented for evaluation at the Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal. The patient had previously undergone a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in the left eye.
Purpose: To report the incidence and outcomes of suction loss during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: The incidence of suction loss was measured over 4000 consecutive SMILE procedures and categorized by cause, the interface in which suction was lost and management (restart/continue SMILE, re-SMILE thinner cap, convert to laser in-situ keratomileusis [LASIK]). One-year outcomes were compared to the fellow eye where no suction loss occurred.
Purpose: To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia.
Methods: This was a prospective study of vertex-centered hyperopic SMILE using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.
We describe a complication of false plane creation during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the surgical plan for subsequent lenticule removal. During a primary SMILE procedure to treat high myopia, the separator instrument entered a false lamellar plane as a result of an area of resistance caused by an area of opaque bubble layer (OBL). The procedure was aborted to avoid removing an irregular lenticule.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for hyperopia.
Methods: This prospective study of vertex-centered hyperopic SMILE used the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.
Purpose: To develop a comprehensive protocol for suction stability management during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: This was a retrospective video review of all SMILE cases where suction loss occurred or eye movement was noted in the medical record. The different types of eye movement were collated.
Purpose: To report the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for hyperopia using the Triple-A ablation profile with the MEL 90 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 1,383 eyes treated by LASIK for hyperopia using the Triple-A ablation profile with the MEL 90 at London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom, between September 2013 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were attempted hyperopic correction of +0.
Purpose: To report the incidence outcomes of sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in a large population.
Methods: This was a retrospective review of a population of 4,000 consecutive eyes treated by SMILE at the London Vision Clinic using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). The inclusion criterion was to have presented with inflammatory keratitis after SMILE.
Purpose: To report the outcomes of LASIK for mixed cylinder using the Triple-A ablation profile with the MEL 90 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all eyes treated by LASIK for mixed cylinder using the Triple-A ablation profile with the MEL 90 laser between July 2013 and October 2016. Patients were observed for 1 year after surgery.
Purpose: To describe the evolution of a flap-lift technique for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and report the incidence of complications.
Setting: London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Purpose: To report the outcomes of LASIK re-treatments after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: Retrospective review of all eyes to have undergone a re-treatment by LASIK after primary SMILE between September 2013 and January 2016. Thin-flap LASIK was used in most cases as long as sufficient tissue was available for safe flap creation between the maximum epithelial thickness and minimum cap thickness.
Purpose: To establish a refractive surgery unit at Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology through support from international donations and provide knowledge transfer for doctors and management to make the unit self-sustaining, nonprofit laser refractive surgery, and financial support for other eyecare projects at Tilganga.
Setting: Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Design: Retrospective study.
Purpose: To report the incidence, visual and refractive outcomes, optical zone enlargement, and recentration using topography-guided CRS-Master TOSCA II software with the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) after primary myopic laser refractive surgery.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 73 eyes (40 patients) with complaints of night vision disturbances due to either a decentration or small optical zone following a primary myopic laser refractive surgery procedure using the MEL 80 laser. Multiple ATLAS topography scans were imported into the CRS-Master software for topography-guided ablation planning.
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in the management of irregularly irregular astigmatism.
Methods: This was a case series of two patients who underwent transepithelial PTK for irregularly irregular astigmatism. In the first case, the patient complained of diplopia due to corneal scarring caused by a metallic foreign body injury.
Purpose: To evaluate optical zone diameter efficacy and spherical aberration change in hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: Prospective study of 60 consecutive hyperopic SMILE procedures using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and matched LASIK procedures with the VisuMax and MEL 80 excimer (Carl Zeiss Meditec) lasers. Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of high hyperopic LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 830 consecutive high hyperopic LASIK procedures using the MEL 80 excimer laser and either the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) or zero compression Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Inclusion criteria were attempted hyperopic correction of +4.
Purpose: To evaluate optical zone centration of hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: This prospective study of 60 consecutive hyperopic SMILE procedures used the VisuMax femtosecond laser and matched LASIK procedures with the VisuMax and MEL 80 excimer lasers (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Inclusion criteria were maximum attempted hyperopic meridian of between +1.
Purpose: Case series report of normal-appearing eyes after hyperopic LASIK exhibiting diurnal shift in refractive error found to correlate with diurnal shifts in epithelial thickness profile.
Methods: Patients complaining of diurnal shift in vision during the course of the day with more hyperopia on waking and decreasing hyperopia in the evening in the absence of abnormal epithelial or slit-lamp findings were examined. Diurnal concomitant measurement of refraction, topography, and Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound scanning (VHFDU) (ArcScan Inc.
Purpose: To evaluate outcomes of high myopic LASIK using the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 479 consecutive high myopic LASIK procedures (318 patients) using the MEL 80 excimer laser and VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) in 77% of cases or zero compression Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) in 23% of cases. Inclusion criteria were preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) of between -8.