Purpose: Insurers often commission psychiatric experts to evaluate the eligibility of workers with mental disorders for disability benefits, by estimating their residual work capacity (RWC). We investigated the validity of a standardized, computer-based battery of established diagnostic instruments, for evaluating the personality, cognition, performance, symptom burden, and symptom validity of claimants.
Methods: One hundred and fifty-three claimants for benefits were assessed by the assembled test battery, which was applied in addition to a conventional clinical work disability evaluation.
Aim: Occupational capacity evaluations have previously been subject to criticism for lacking in quality and consistency. To the authors' knowledge, there is no clear consensus on the best way to formally assess functioning within capacity evaluations. In this review we investigated different instruments that are used to assess functioning in occupational capacity evaluations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLimited knowledge of the German language represents a serious barrier for migrants into Switzerland to communicate successfully in a variety of health care settings, which may result not just in delayed access to treatment and poorer outcome, but also in difficulties judging eligibility for health and other social benefits. Especially when conducting disability and other occupational capacity evaluations, clinicians of all medical fields, but particularly psychiatrists, are required to obtain abundant information to allow them to perform a thorough mental health examination and to form a differentiated view of an evaluee's work capacity. Within a clinical context different translation and interpreting strategies are in use, and each strategy has its advantages and disadvantages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF