Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely conducted and successful orthopedic procedure. However, aseptic loosening, a common cause of TKA failure, necessitates revision surgery. Diagnostic accuracy of triphasic bone scintigraphy, a common imaging modality for aseptic loosening detection, remains controversial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Establishing the diagnosis of loosening in total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty remains a challenge with different clinical and radiological signs evaluated in study designs with high risk of bias, where few or incomplete criteria are formulated for establishing the diagnosis of implant loosening. This study aimed at evaluating the variability between different clinical and radiological criteria and establish a consensus regarding clinical and radiological criteria for the diagnosis of knee arthroplasty loosening.
Methods: Highly specialized knee surgeons focusing on revision arthroplasty were invited to take part in an international panel for a Delphi consensus study.
Purpose: There is a lack of a clear, uniform definition for intraoperatively assessed component loosening of a knee arthroplasty component, complicating the interpretation and interchangeability of results of diagnostic studies using an intraoperative observation as the reference test. The purpose of this study was to establish a consensus among specialised knee revision surgeons regarding the definition of intraoperatively determined loosening of total or unicondylar knee arthroplasty components.
Methods: Utilising the Delphi consensus method, an international panel of highly specialised knee revision surgeons was invited to participate in a three-round process.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
May 2024
Purpose: Aseptic loosening often requires major, expensive and invasive revision surgery. Current diagnostic modalities merely show indirect signs of loosening. A recent proof of concept study proposed a non-invasive technique for the quantitative and visual assessment of implant movement as a diagnostic aid for tibial component loosening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of modalities used to aid the diagnosis of aseptic knee arthroplasty loosening.
Methods: A comparative diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Cochrane and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for original articles evaluating diagnostic modalities up to March 2024.
Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in teenagers is generally avoided. Nevertheless, recent THA procedures in a very young patient show improved functional outcomes and implant survival, resulting in lower revision rates. This review aims to present an overview of the available literature on THA in teenagers and to provide evidence to inform caregivers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: After total knee arthroplasty up to 13% requires revision surgery to address loosening. No current diagnostic modalities have a sensitivity or specificity higher than 70-80% to detect loosening, leading to 20-30% of patients undergoing unnecessary, risky and expensive revision surgery. A reliable imaging modality is required to diagnose loosening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStudy Design: Cross-sectional validation study.
Objective: The aim was to validate the AO Spine Patient-Reported Outcome Spine Trauma (PROST) at a minimum of 12 months posttrauma and to evaluate patient characteristics, types of spine fractures, and treatment strategies as determinants of AO Spine PROST scores.
Summary Of Background Data: The reliability and validity of the AO Spine PROST as a measure of health-related quality of life for more than 12 months after onset of spine trauma is unclear.
Purpose/objective: This multicenter study assessed the incidence and survival of patients with esophagogastric cancer and oligometastatic disease (OMD) in two tertiary referral cancer centers in The Netherlands and Switzerland.
Materials/methods: Between 2010 and 2021, patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer were identified. Patients with de-novo OMD were included (first-time diagnosis of ≤5 distant metastases on F-FDG-PET/CT).
Background: The primary goal of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer. The secondary goal was to determine prognostic factors for OS.
Methods: Patients with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer who underwent local treatment or systemic therapy were included in this single-center, retrospective cohort study.