Frequent hemodialysis requires using the vascular access more often than with conventional hemodialysis, but whether this increases the risk for access-related complications is unknown. In two separate trials, we randomly assigned 245 patients to receive in-center daily hemodialysis (6 days per week) or conventional hemodialysis (3 days per week) and 87 patients to receive home nocturnal hemodialysis (6 nights per week) or conventional hemodialysis, for 12 months. The primary vascular access outcome was time to first access event (repair, loss, or access-related hospitalization).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sponsored a randomized clinical trial comparing six versus three times per week in-center hemodialysis (the Frequent Hemodialysis Network [FHN] Daily Trial), to test the effects of frequent hemodialysis on an array of intermediate outcomes. Herein we report challenges to enrollment and randomization into the trial.
Methods: Screening and enrollment was tracked at all participating dialysis clinics and specific reasons for dropout after baseline assessment were recorded for all enrolled subjects.
Background: In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to determine whether increasing the frequency of in-center hemodialysis would result in beneficial changes in left ventricular mass, self-reported physical health, and other intermediate outcomes among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo hemodialysis six times per week (frequent hemodialysis, 125 patients) or three times per week (conventional hemodialysis, 120 patients) for 12 months. The two coprimary composite outcomes were death or change (from baseline to 12 months) in left ventricular mass, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and death or change in the physical-health composite score of the RAND 36-item health survey.
More frequent hemodialysis (5 or more times weekly, both short during the day and long overnight) has been shown to improve patient well-being, reduce symptoms during and between treatments, and have beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Because of the relatively small patient sample sizes, there are little or no data on mortality from any single study at this time. This study compares survival in 117 U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Conventional hemodialysis (CHD) is associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes and high mortality rates. Daily hemodialysis (DHD) has been reported to improve outcomes and quality of life (QOL), predominantly in self-care or home dialysis populations. The effect of short DHD (sDHD) on patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with high comorbidities has not been established.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBlood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels obtained at 30 minutes before the end of dialysis were found to be closely similar to equilibrated, postdialysis BUN values obtained 30 minutes after the end of dialysis. Because of this similarity, the former BUN values can be used to derive equilibrated urea reduction ratio, or equilibrated Kt/V instead.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF