Publications by authors named "Gabrielle Gafford"

Significance: Both the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF) tablet and home versions are easy-to-use, portable, and low-cost and accurate methods of evaluating visual fields.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the clinical capabilities of the MRF perimetry test by comparing it with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), determine MRF consistency, assess the influence of refractive error, ascertain ambient illumination effects, and evaluate the consistency between the tablet and Internet Web site versions of the MRF.

Methods: Forty healthy young participants with normal visual function (33 female, 7 male; average age, 24 years) underwent two MRF office-based tablet, two HFA tests, and two MRF Web site-based tests, one in our laboratory and one at home on their own computer using the 24-2 test pattern each time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF