Analysis of composite time-to-event endpoints in cardiovascular outcome trials.

Composite time-to-event endpoints are commonly used in cardiovascular outcome trials. For example, the IMPROVE-IT trial comparing ezetimibe+simvastatin to placebo+simvastatin in 18,144 patients with acute coronary syndrome used a primary composite endpoint with five component outcomes: (1) cardiovascular death, (2) non-fatal stroke, (3) non-fatal myocardial infarction, (4) coronary revascularization ≥30 days after randomization, and (5) unstable angina requiring hospitalization. In such settings, the traditional analysis compares treatments using the observed time to the occurrence of the first (i.

Robust analyzes for longitudinal clinical trials with missing and non-normal continuous outcomes.

Missing data is unavoidable in longitudinal clinical trials, and outcomes are not always normally distributed. In the presence of outliers or heavy-tailed distributions, the conventional multiple imputation with the mixed model with repeated measures analysis of the average treatment effect (ATE) based on the multivariate normal assumption may produce bias and power loss. Control-based imputation (CBI) is an approach for evaluating the treatment effect under the assumption that participants in both the test and control groups with missing outcome data have a similar outcome profile as those with an identical history in the control group.

Efficient Multiple Imputation for Sensitivity Analysis of Recurrent Events Data with Informative Censoring.

Missing data are commonly encountered in clinical trials due to dropout or nonadherence to study procedures. In trials in which recurrent events are of interest, the observed count can be an undercount of the events if a patient drops out before the end of the study. In many applications, the data are not necessarily missing at random and it is often not possible to test the missing at random assumption.

Efficacy and safety of the addition of sitagliptin to treatment of youth with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on metformin without or with insulin.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin ± insulin.

Study Design: Data were pooled from two 54-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of sitagliptin 100 mg daily or placebo added onto treatment of 10- to 17-year-old youth with T2D and inadequate glycemic control on metformin ± insulin. Participants (N = 220 randomized and treated) had HbA1c 6.

A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as initial oral therapy in youth with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibition with sitagliptin in youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Study Design: This was a 54-week, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of DPP-4 inhibition with sitagliptin 100 mg once daily as initial oral therapy in youth with T2D. The 190 participants, aged 10-17 years, had HbA1c 6.