Vestibular humanoid postural control.

Many of our motor activities require stabilization against external disturbances. This especially applies to biped stance since it is inherently unstable. Disturbance compensation is mainly reactive, depending on sensory inputs and real-time sensor fusion.

Posture control in vestibular-loss patients.

Patients with chronic bilateral loss of vestibular functions normally replace these by visual or haptic referencing to stationary surroundings, resulting in an almost normal stance control. But with eyes closed, they show abnormally large body sway, and may tend to fall when there are external disturbances to the body or when standing on an unstable support surface. Patients' postural responses depend on joint angle proprioception and ground reaction-force cues (occasionally referred to as "somatosensory graviception").

Human stance control beyond steady state response and inverted pendulum simplification.

Systems theory analyses have suggested that human upright stance can be modelled in terms of continuous multi-sensory feedback control. So far, these analyses have considered mainly steady-state responses to periodic stimuli and relied on a simplifying model of the body's mechanics in the form of an inverted pendulum. Therefore, they may have ignored relevant aspects of the postural behaviour.

A cognitive intersensory interaction mechanism in human postural control.

Human control of upright body posture involves inputs from several senses (visual, vestibular, proprioceptive, somatosensory) and their central interactions. We recently studied visual effects on posture control and their intersensory interactions and found evidence for the existence of an indirect and presumably cognitive mode of interaction, in addition to a direct interaction (we found, e.g.

Human postural responses to motion of real and virtual visual environments under different support base conditions.

The role of visual orientation cues for human control of upright stance is still not well understood. We, therefore, investigated stance control during motion of a visual scene as stimulus, varying the stimulus parameters and the contribution from other senses (vestibular and leg proprioceptive cues present or absent). Eight normal subjects and three patients with chronic bilateral loss of vestibular function participated.