Publications by authors named "G Luengo-Alonso"
Article Synopsis
- * Involving 140 patients with a mean age of 28.5 years, the research found that 95% had synovial or cartilage lesions, with a majority showing mild to moderate severity of OA at the time of surgery.
- * Key risk factors correlated with more severe OA included older age, younger age at first shoulder dislocation, and a higher number of dislocations, highlighting the importance of these factors in patient assessments.
Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in patients with structural dynamic posterior instability (Moroder classification B2), analyzing factors associated with inferior clinical outcomes or recurrence. The primary hypothesis is that this surgical approach in patients without static structural changes such as excessive glenoid retroversion or dysplastic glenoids will result in satisfactory clinical outcomes and low failure rates.
Methods: We conducted observational retrospective analysis in patients diagnosed with posterior structural dynamic instability who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyse clinical, functional and shoulder kinematics results using subacromial balloon spacer in nonreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Subacromial balloon spacer was hypothesised to improve shoulder kinematics and increases clinical and functional outcomes scores in nonreparable massive rotator cuff tears.
Methods: This is a prospective study in massive rotator cuff tears.
Purpose: To determine arthroscopic Bankart repair outcomes and recurrence risk factors at a minimum 5-year follow-up.
Methods: Retrospective assessment of prospectively collected data, single-cohort study of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Demographical and preoperative instability features were collected.
Background: The role of arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization after failed arthroscopic Bankart repair has yet to be definitively established and merits further investigation.
Objective: To assess clinical and radiological outcomes after arthroscopic Latarjet stabilization as a revision procedure for failed Bankart repair, as well as the return to athletic activity and complication rates.
Methods: Between 2009 and 2020, patients with a previous failed arthroscopic Bankart repair who were treated with an arthroscopic Latarjet were retrospectively evaluated.