Immune perturbations in human pancreas lymphatic tissues prior to and after type 1 diabetes onset.

Autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells results in type 1 diabetes (T1D), with pancreatic immune infiltrate representing a key feature in this process. Studies of human T1D immunobiology have predominantly focused on circulating immune cells in the blood, while mouse models suggest diabetogenic lymphocytes primarily reside in pancreas-draining lymph nodes (pLN). A comprehensive study of immune cells in human T1D was conducted using pancreas draining lymphatic tissues, including pLN and mesenteric lymph nodes, and the spleen from non-diabetic control, β cell autoantibody positive non-diabetic (AAb+), and T1D organ donors using complementary approaches of high parameter flow cytometry and CITEseq.

Development of a differential treatment selection model for depression on consolidated and transformed clinical trial datasets.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is the leading cause of disability worldwide, yet treatment selection still proceeds via "trial and error". Given the varied presentation of MDD and heterogeneity of treatment response, the use of machine learning to understand complex, non-linear relationships in data may be key for treatment personalization. Well-organized, structured data from clinical trials with standardized outcome measures is useful for training machine learning models; however, combining data across trials poses numerous challenges.

Correction: Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered, Web-Based Clinical Decision Support System for the Treatment of Depression in Adults: Longitudinal Feasibility Study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/31862.].

Towards Outcome-Driven Patient Subgroups: A Machine Learning Analysis Across Six Depression Treatment Studies.

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous condition; multiple underlying neurobiological and behavioral substrates are associated with treatment response variability. Understanding the sources of this variability and predicting outcomes has been elusive. Machine learning (ML) shows promise in predicting treatment response in MDD, but its application is limited by challenges to the clinical interpretability of ML models, and clinicians often lack confidence in model results.