Amisulpride vs. risperidone in chronic schizophrenia: results of a 6-month double-blind study.

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized study evaluated the efficacy, safety and functional effects of two atypical antipsychotics, amisulpride and risperidone, in patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM IV) with a recent worsening of symptoms. It was planned as a non-inferiority trial. 309 patients received amisulpride (400-1,000 mg/day) or risperidone (4-10 mg/day) for six months.

A double-blind, randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia: short-term results at two months.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the atypical antipsychotics amisulpride and olanzapine in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.

Design And Setting: A multinational, double-blind randomised clinical trial.

Patients And Treatment: Three hundred and seventy-seven patients with predominantly positive symptomatology were treated for six months with either amisulpride (200-800 mg/d) or olanzapine (5-20 mg/d).

Amisulpride vs. risperidone in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. Amisulpride study group.

Amisulpride, a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopamine D3 and D2 receptors, was compared with the antipsychotic risperidone in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. The study was double-blind and involved 228 patients allocated, after a 3-6-day wash-out period, to amisulpride 800 mg (n = 115) or risperidone 8 mg (n = 113) for 8 weeks. Both treatments produced a marked improvement in schizophrenic symptomatology.

Improvement of schizophrenic patients with primary negative symptoms treated with amisulpride. Amisulpride Study Group.

Objective: The goal of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low doses of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic of the benzamide class with high affinity for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with predominantly primary negative symptoms.

Method: After completion of a 4-week washout period, schizophrenic patients with primary negative symptoms participated in a 12-week, multicenter double-blind trial of placebo (N = 83), amisulpride, 50 mg/day (N = 84), or amisulpride, 100 mg/day (N = 75). They were evaluated with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.

Amisulpride versus amineptine and placebo for the treatment of dysthymia.

Amisulpride, a selective antagonist for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, acts preferentially on presynaptic receptors increasing dopaminergic transmission at low doses. In a multicentre, 3-month, placebo-controlled study, amisulpride (50 mg/day) was compared to amineptine (200 mg/day) in the treatment of primary dysthymia. A total of 323 patients were enrolled.

Amisulpride, and atypical antipsychotic, in the treatment of acute episodes of schizophrenia: a dose-ranging study vs. haloperidol. The Amisulpride Study Group.

This 4-week, double-blind, randomized study was undertaken to determine the dose-response relationship of amisulpride in 319 patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Fixed doses of amisulpride (400, 800 and 1200 mg/day) and haloperidol (16 mg/day) were compared to amisulpride, 100 mg/day, as a potentially subtherapeutic dose. Efficacy data (BPRS total score and PANSS positive subscale) in the amisulpride groups generated a bell-shaped dose-response curve, with 400 mg/day and 800 mg/day being the most effective treatments for positive symptoms.

Improvement of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia with amisulpride: a comparison with haloperidol. PROD-ASLP Study Group.

Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopaminergic D2 and D3 receptors. This study compared 800 mg/day amisulpride and 20 mg/day haloperidol in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. This multicenter, double-blind trial involved 191 patients allocated, after a 1 to 7-day wash-out period, to amisulpride (n = 95) or haloperidol (n = 96) for 6 weeks.

Amisulpride versus placebo in the medium-term treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Background: Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of 100 mg amisulpride in patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Method: This was a multi-centre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind study.

A comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of conventional and sustained-release preparations of acebutolol in healthy volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics and the degree of beta-blockade of sustained release (SR) acebutolol (500 mg/day) and conventional acebutolol (200 mg tid) were examined after the first oral dose and after 10 days of treatment in ten healthy volunteers. After the first dose, acebutolol Cmax did not significantly differ between the two formulations; however, on day 10 acebutolol Cmax was significantly higher after SR formulation. Cmax of diacetolol, the major metabolite, did not differ between SR and conventional acebutolol neither on day 1 nor on day 10.

Effects of bepridil and CERM 4205 (ORG 30701) on the relation between cardiac cycle length and QT duration in healthy volunteers.

Bepridil is a calcium antagonist that prolongs the duration of ventricular repolarization, whereas CERM 4205, another calcium antagonist, seems to be devoid of any effect on QT interval. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of bepridil and CERM 4205 on the QT-RR relation at different heart rates during rest and exercise and the results of pharmacologic tests designed to vary neurovegetative tone. Twelve healthy men (21 to 37 years) participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, double-blind study and received either bepridil (200 mg/day twice daily) or CERM 4205 (200 mg/day twice daily), or matching placebo during three 14-day treatment periods at 2-week intervals.