Purpose: Lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS) is common for lumbar degenerative disorders. The objective was to develop clinical prediction rules to identify which patients are likely to have a favourable outcome to inform decisions regarding surgery and rehabilitation.
Methods: A prospective observational study recruited 600 (derivation) and 600 (internal validation) consecutive adult patients undergoing LSFS for degenerative lumbar disorder through the British Spine Registry.
Employees with mental health problems often struggle to remain in employment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, these employees face multiple additional stressors, which are likely to worsen their mental health and work productivity. Currently, it is unclear how to best support employees with mental health problems (and their managers) to improve wellbeing and productivity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Debate regarding effectiveness of surgical modalities contributes to a lack of consensus of decision making for surgical interventions. Furthermore, data regarding cost effectiveness, surgical operative time, resources, patient hospital stay and recovery is limited, particularly in the medium term for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. The objective was to compare clinical outcomes following different fixation interventions treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To understand the patient journey to Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery (LSFS) and patients' experiences of surgery.
Methods: Qualitative study using interpretive phenomenological analysis. Adult participants following LSFS were recruited from 4 UK clinical sites using purposive sampling to ensure representation of key features (e.
Objective: To establish how advanced practice physiotherapists in the UK working in the musculoskeletal specialty are utilising their independent non-medical prescribing skills.
Design: Multi-site, prospective, descriptive observational study. Ethics reference No: ERN_19-0994).
Purpose: Following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) up to 40% of people report persistent walking disability. This study aimed to identify pre-operative factors that are predictive of walking ability post-surgery for LSS.
Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted using data from the British Spine Registry (2017-2018) of adults (≥ 50 years) with LSS, who underwent ≤ 2 level posterior lumbar decompression.
Background: This study investigated the completeness, accuracy, quality and clinical outcomes of the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS) registry - Ankle Arthrodesis pathway.
Methods: An observational study using retrospective data derived from the BOFAS registry. Adults aged ≥18 years with a record of undergoing ankle arthrodesis in the UK from 2014 to 31/10/2019 were included.
The aim of this study was to capture and understand the immediate recovery journey of patients following lumbar spinal fusion surgery and explore the interacting constructs that shape their journey. A qualitative study using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach. A purposive sample of 43 adult patients (≥16 years) undergoing ≤4 level instrumented fusion for back and/or leg pain of degenerative cause, were recruited pre-surgery from 4 UK spinal surgery centres.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF