A randomized clinical trial of the effects of saphenous and perforating veins radiofrequency ablation on venous ulcer healing (VUERT trial).

Objectives: To investigate whether radiofrequency endovenous ablation (RFA) of saphenous and perforating veins increases venous leg ulcer (VLU) healing rates and prevents ulcer recurrence.

Method: This prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, single-center trial recruited 56 patients with VLU divided into: compression alone (CR, N = 29) and RFA plus compression (RF, N = 27). Primary endpoints were ulcer recurrence rate at 12 months; and ulcer healing rates at 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

Electronic IR Group Peer Review and Learning Performed during Daily Clinical Rounds.

Purpose: To describe the implementation and efficacy of electronic capture of interventional radiology (IR) group peer review performed during morning rounds in an academic institution.

Materials And Methods: Peer-review submissions 24 months before (July 2012 through June 2014) and 24 months after (July 2014 through June 2016) implementation of an electronic group IR peer review were evaluated. Electronic IR peer review assessed clinical decision-making, patient care, and technique appropriateness by using the following responses: agree, acceptable alternative, or inappropriate.

Patient safety in phlebology: The ACP Phlebology Safety Checklist.

Objectives To assess the current use of safety checklists among the American College of Phlebology (ACP) members and their interest in implementing a checklist supported by the ACP on their clinical practices; and to develop a phlebology safety checklist. Method Online surveys were sent to ACP members, and a phlebology safety checklist was developed by a multispecialty team through the ACP Leadership Academy. Results Forty-seven percent of respondents are using a safety checklist in their practices; 23% think that a phlebology safety checklist would interfere or disrupt workflow; 79% answered that a phlebology safety checklist could improve procedure outcomes or prevent complications; and 85% would be interested in implementing a phlebology safety checklist approved by the ACP.

Reinsertion of accidentally dislodged catheters through the original track: what is the likelihood of success?

Purpose: To determine the success rate for reinsertion of interventional radiology-placed catheters that were accidentally removed by using the existing percutaneous track and to investigate factors that influence success rate.

Materials And Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 225 patients who presented with dislodged catheters (24 tunneled central venous catheters, 170 gastrostomy/jejunostomy tubes, 25 nephrostomy catheters, five biliary catheters, and one transhepatic hemodialysis catheter) and underwent attempts for reinsertion between 1999 and 2007. Data obtained from the radiology information system included the type of catheter and the indwelling and reinsertion times.