Outcomes of Platinum-Sensitive Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Platinum/Etoposide Rechallenge: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis.

Unlabelled: Small-cell lung cancer has a high chemotherapeutic sensitivity but with disappointing outcome results. Patients with “sensitive disease” are those who respond to treatment with a long relapse-free interval (RFI): in these cases rechallenge with first-line chemotherapy might represent a therapeutic opportunity. Our largest retrospective experience confirmed that rechallenge is feasible with interesting outcome results; there are no statistical differences between RFI and outcome.

Noninferiority trials in second-line treatments of nonsmall cell lung cancer: a systematic review of literature with meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials.

Background: To assess the role of the novel second-line treatments in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis of phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was independently performed by 3 authors. All the trials comparing any novel treatment with every-3-weeks docetaxel (3WD) and designed as noninferiority trial were included in the analysis.

Bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: an evidence-based approach.

Background: To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced, chemotherapy-naive, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the basis of the two registrative trials [ECOG E4599 trial and BO17704 (AVAiL) trial].

Methods: A pooled analysis of the two trials was performed using a random effect model, and the results were summarized as number-needed-to-treat (NNT) and number-needed-to-harm (NNH). A 2-step analysis was performed.

[Neuropathic pain in oncology. Novel evidence for clinical practice].

Neuropathic pain is usually considered an "hard pain" both for the intrinsic difficulties in a correct diagnosis, and for the modest efficacy of the most part of conventional treatments. The most frequently used drugs in clinical practice are tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants, while a minor role is reserved to NSAIDs or to strong opiates. Aim of our work was to systematically analyze all the evidences of literature about the treatment options against neuropathic pain in oncology, focusing our attention upon the efficacy and the safety of the different therapeutic options assessed as Number-Needed-to-Treat (NNT) and Number-Needed-to-Harm (NNH).

[Transdermal opiates in the treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain. Recommendations for clinical practice].

Although oral morphine is the gold standard in the front-line approach to moderate-severe cancer pain, transdermal opiates are largely used in clinical practice. Aims of our work were to review the evidences of literature supporting these different habits and to suggest an evidence-based criterion to guide clinical research and clinical practice. A systematic review of literature with meta-analysis of the safety data reported in randomized clinical trials comparing slow releasing oral morphine and transdermal opiates was performed using the random effect model.

[Role of sequential chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer].

Background: Aim of our work was to assess the role of prognostic and predictive factors in patients to be treated with II and III line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods: All the patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and progressed after I line chemotherapy were considered eligible and enrolled into the trial.

Results: Twenty-six out of 51 consecutive, and potentially eligible patients (51%) were considered eligible and included into the analysis.

Second line treatments in advanced platinum-resistant non small cell lung cancer. A critical review of literature.

In the last 10 years the medical approach to platinum-resistant Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has radically changed, passing from a lack of evidence of any primary treatment against the tumor, to the identification of chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors as the gold standard for clinical practice. Eight randomized clinical trials support the evidence of efficacy of second-line treatments against NSCLC, and docetaxel, pemetrexed and erlotinib are the most effective options for clinical practice. However, many aspects remain still undefined: Can a treatment with docetaxel, pemetrexed or erlotinib be considered the gold standard for all patients with platinum-resistant NSCLC, and consequently should all patients be treated with at least one of these options? Are the benefits enough to justify the side effects observed with these chemotherapeutic options? Can a schedule be preferred to the others for either efficacy or safety profile? Can the new EGFR inhibitors be considered an innovation in the treatment of platinum-resistant NSCLC, and should they be used in all patients with platinum-resistant NSCLC? A systematic review of randomized clinical trials and a critical analysis of the results were performed with the aim to clarify the real meaning of medical treatments in advanced, platinum-resistant NSCLC.