Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Nurse Anesthesia and the Aftermath of Perioperative Catastrophes Survey and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire.

The National Academy of Medicine recognizes medical errors as a leading cause of death in the United States. Hospitals nationwide have acted to improve patient safety, quality of care, and system processes; however, no standards mandate assessment of the emotional impact of perioperative catastrophes on healthcare professionals. A cross-sectional descriptive study using a sample of 196 Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) tested the psychometric properties of an adapted version of the Perioperative Catastrophes Survey and administered this survey along with the Ways of Coping Questionnaire to measure CRNAs' perceptions, experiences, and responses associated with perioperative catastrophes.

The impact of perioperative catastrophes on anesthesiologists: results of a national survey.

Background: Most anesthesiologists will experience at least one perioperative catastrophe over the course of their careers. Very little, however, is known about the emotional impact of these events and their effects on both immediate and long-term ability to provide care. In this study, we examined the incidence of perioperative catastrophes and the impact of these outcomes on American anesthesiologists.

Life after death: the aftermath of perioperative catastrophes.

Most anesthesiologists will experience the perioperative death of a patient or a major perioperative catastrophe in the course of their careers. Anesthesia training, however, does not prepare individuals to handle the aftermath of such a stressful event. Multiple surveys have shown that the death of a patient has a major emotional impact on up to 75% of health care providers involved, regardless of whether the death was expected or whether the patient was well known to the practitioner.

Effect of ropivacaine skull block on perioperative outcomes in patients with supratentorial brain tumors and comparison with remifentanil: a pilot study.

Object: Skull blockade for craniotomy may result in the reduction of sympathetic stimulation associated with the application of head pins ("pinning"), improvement in intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and a decrease in intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Postoperative benefits may include a decrease in pain, in analgesic requirements, and in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The authors examined the potential benefits of a skull block in patients in whom a maintenance anesthetic consisting of sevoflurane and a titratable remifentanil infusion was used.