Publications by authors named "F Rozet"

Article Synopsis
  • * A systematic review of recent literature (2022-2024) was undertaken to evaluate diagnostic and treatment methods, providing evidence-based recommendations.
  • * Key recommendations include using MRI before biopsies, considering transperineal biopsies to lower infection risks, and active surveillance for low-risk tumors to enhance patient management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of This Document: The Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association is proposing updated recommendations for the management of recurrent and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was conducted by the CCAFU on the therapeutic management of recurrent PCa following local or metastatic treatment, assessing the references based on their level of evidence.

Results: Molecular imaging is the standard approach for assessing recurrence after local treatment and should not delay early salvage treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the evolution of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 6 months of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) therapy among age groups for patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

Patients And Methods: PRISME (NCT03516110) was a non-interventional, prospective study conducted in France in patients aged ≥60 years with PCa initiating GnRHa therapy within routine care. HRQoL was evaluated at baseline and after 6 months using the EORTC quality of life in ELDerly cancer patients 14 items (QLQ-ELD14) questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recent guidelines favor transperineal (TP) prostate biopsies over the transrectal (TR) approach due to a reduced sepsis risk. Yet, evidence from controlled trial comparing both approaches within the MRI-targeted pathway for significant prostate cancer (PCa) detection is lacking.

Objective: To compare the significant PCa detection rate between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted TR and TP approaches in biopsy-naïve patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radical prostatectomy (RP) can be performed using an open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP) or robotic (RARP) approach. Most studies, even in experienced centers, have not provided solid evidence demonstrating better outcomes when using the robotic approach. In addition, one of the remaining concerns about RARP is its cost effectiveness, leading to no reimbursement for this surgical technique in some countries and thus health care inequality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF