Probing the Causal Contribution of Reasoning to Third-Party Moral Judgment of Harm Transgressions.

Recent work has supported the role of reasoning in third-party moral judgment of harm transgressions. In particular, reasoning may increase the weight of intention in moral judgment, especially following accidental harm, a situation that presumably requires judges to balance considerations about the outcome endured by a victim on the one hand and considerations about an agent's intention to cause harm on the other hand. Three preregistered lab-based studies aimed to test the causal contribution of reasoning to moral judgment of harm transgressions using experimental manipulations borrowed from the reasoning literature: time pressure (Experiment 1), cognitive load (Experiment 2), and priming (Experiment 3).

"Gender matters": the development of infographics to raise awareness and promote gender-transformative care in traumatic brain injury.

Purpose: To develop a series of infographics providing persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their circle of care with evidence-based information on sex and gender topics in TBI.

Materials And Methods: We employed an iterative participatory design engaging knowledge users, scientists, and experts in brain injury and patient education. To inform infographic content, we conducted an information needs assessment with knowledge users through semi-structured interviews and referred to our previously published evidence syntheses on TBI topics.

Abdominal Applications of Photon-Counting CT.

Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has shown promising advancements in abdominal imaging in clinical use. Though more peer-reviewed primary literature is needed, this commentary explores PCCT's potential applications, focusing on enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing radiation dose management, and improving patient care. PCCT offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, lower image noise, and reduced radiation dose.

The good, the rich, and the powerful: How young children compensate victims of moral transgressions depending on moral character, wealth, and social dominance.

Theories of justice suggest that it serves two main purposes: punishment and restoration. Although punishment emerges early and has been well-documented, little is known about the contexts in which young children engage in restorative practices like compensation for victims. The current study investigated whether children's engagement in compensation and punishment (which often involve a redistribution of resources) was sensitive to characteristics of the perpetrator and victim known to shape distributive justice decisions (decisions about how resources should be distributed), such as social dominance, resource inequality, and moral character.