Biologic mesh has been used increasingly in complex ventral hernia repair despite limited evidence at low risk of bias supporting its use. We performed a participant-level analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologic to synthetic mesh with complex ventral hernia repair at 24 to 36 months. Primary outcome was major complication (composite of mesh infection, recurrence, reoperation, or death) at 24 to 36 months post-operative.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate which mesh type yields lower recurrence and complication rates after ventral hernia repair.
Summary Background Data: More than 400,000 ventral hernia repairs are performed annually in the United States. Although the most effective method for repairing ventral hernias involves using mesh, whether to use biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh is controversial.
Background: Open abdominal surgery is frequently complicated by the subsequent development of an incisional hernia. Consequently, more than 400,000 incisional hernia repairs are performed each year, adding over $15 billion per year to U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: We used an evidence-based approach to determine whether the promotions and claims of superiority of biologic mesh over synthetic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs (VHRs) under contaminated conditions were sound and valid.
Methods: We searched the Medline database to specifically identify review articles relating to biologic mesh and VHR and critically reviewed these studies using an evidence-based approach.
Results: For the past 45 years, four clinical reviews and one systematic review have included biologic meshes as part of a larger discussion on available prosthetics for VHR.