Background: The indication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has not been fully established yet for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Aim: To relate the conversion rate to invasive carcinoma with sentinel node positivity in high risk DCIS, and to refine the clinical presentation analysis in order to better select patients for SNB. For this purpose, a risk score was devised.
Introduction: The practice of intratumoral radiocolloid injection for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) allows localization of nonpalpable breast tumors in the same surgical intervention, using the technique known as radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL).
Patients And Method: We present our experience with the combined use of both techniques (SNB and ROLL). A total of 233 patients were retrospectively analyzed: 65 patients underwent ROLL and 168 patients underwent wire-guided localization (control group) as the excision modality.
A 35 year old woman with biopsy proved breast cancer was submitted for sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy displayed both axillary and internal mammary (IM) uptake foci consistent with SNs. Full axillary dissection was completed because of a greater-than 2 cm primary lesion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: As sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) becomes a new surgical standard in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma, there is an emergent need for a fast and accurate method with which to assess the SN intraoperatively, so a decision can be made regarding whether to perform axillary lymph node dissection during primary surgery. In the current study, the authors performed a prospective investigation of the relative merits of imprint cytology for that purpose.
Methods: Seventy-six patients with T1-T2 breast carcinoma were included after undergoing successful SNB.
Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as an alternative to axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer. Before implementing SNB in our practice, we wished to test its validity by comparing it to the standard ALND, both in our hands and with other reported series.
Patients And Methods: One hundred thirty-two patients were included prospectively.