Predicting the Risk of Adverse Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Insulin-Treated Diabetes: Is It Time for a Pregnancy-Specific Glycemic Risk Index (GRI)?

Background: The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) describes the quality of glycemic control, emphasizing extreme hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia more than less extreme values. However, a pregnancy-specific GRI (pGRI), tailored to the tighter target glucose range required during pregnancy, has not been established.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical, metabolic, and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) data across pregnancy in women with insulin-treated diabetes, managed between September 2021 and March 2024 at the University Hospital of Pisa.

Accuracy of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring during caesarean delivery in pregnant women with insulin-treated diabetes.

Aim: Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems are not currently recommended to guide intrapartum glucose and insulin infusion, due to insufficient data. In this study, intrapartum accuracy of intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM), compared to simultaneously measured capillary glucose (CG), was evaluated.

Methods: Paired isCGM (Freestyle Libre 2) - CG data during caesarean delivery in pregnant women with insulin-treated diabetes were prospectively collected.

BRAF K601E Mutation in Oncocytic Carcinoma of the Thyroid: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Background: Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is the most common endocrine cancer, with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) being the most common subtype. BRAF and RAS oncogene were characterized as the most frequently altered genes in PTC, with a strong association between genotype and histotype. The most common mutation in BRAF gene is V600E and is prevalent in classic and aggressive variants of PTC, while BRAF K601E mutation is the most common among the other rare BRAF mutations.

Advances in diabetes management: have pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes changed in the last decades?

Aims: Over the recent years multiple therapeutic and management opportunities have been made available to treat pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM). However, analyses assessing whether these different approaches may have any specific advantage/disadvantage in metabolic control and neonatal outcomes is still limited. The aim of this study was to compare metabolic control and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM among different basal insulins (NPH vs.