Aims: The aim of this trial was to compare the clinical effects of intraoperative haemoadsorption versus standard care in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).
Methods And Results: In a randomized, controlled trial, OHT recipients were randomized to receive intraoperative haemoadsorption or standard care. Outcomes were vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), frequency of vasoplegic syndrome (VS) in the first 24 h; post-operative change in procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels; intraoperative change in mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration; frequency of post-operative organ dysfunction, major complications, adverse immunological events and length of in-hospital stay and 1-year survival.
The standard process of basic and advanced life support can be complicated by a number of special circumstances. Over the last decade, the European Resuscitation Council developed an increasingly detailed guideline regarding the diagnosis and therapy of these situations. In our short review, we summarize the most important recommendations for the management of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in special circumstances.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: The benefit of using gelatin solution in cardiac surgery is still controversial. Previous data suggested adverse interactions of gelatin infusion with acute kidney injury (AKI) or coagulopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between perioperative gelatin use and fluid overload (FO), hemodynamic stability, and outcomes compared to crystalloid-based fluid management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The goal of this study was to compare factor concentrate (FC)-based and blood product-based hemostasis management of coagulopathy in cardiac surgical patients in terms of postoperative bleeding, required blood products, and outcome.
Design: Retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis.
Setting: Single, tertiary, academic medical center.
Introduction: The use of noninvasive ventilation has increased worldwide. Its mortality reducing benefit has been shown in several different conditions compared to invasive ventilation. Common counterarguments against the technique are its increased technical and caregiver requirements and increased mortality associated with treatment failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF