Modifying insecure attachment style with cognitive bias modification.

Background And Objectives: Attachment theory suggests that internal working models developed from early experiences with attachment figures biases cognitive appraisals a person makes of themselves and others. The current paper investigates whether attachment-related interpretative biases can be altered using Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM-I).

Methods: Eighty anxiously attached participants were randomly assigned to receive either secure or insecure CBM-I training.

Protocol for the avatar acceptability study: a multiperspective cross-sectional study evaluating the acceptability of using patient-derived xenografts to guide personalised cancer care in Australia and New Zealand.

Introduction: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have the potential to transform personalised cancer care, however, little is known about the acceptability of using PDXs to guide treatment decision-making. Given that patient and community preferences can influence satisfaction with care as well as the success of new technologies, we will evaluate the acceptability of PDXs in individuals affected by cancer and community comparisons.

Methods And Analysis: This comparative cross-sectional study will recruit 323 individuals affected by cancer (cancer survivors (of childhood or adult cancer) and parents of childhood cancer survivors) and 323 community comparisons (adults and parents).

The impact of enhancing perceived self-efficacy in torture survivors.

Background: Perceived self-efficacy (SE) is an important factor underlying psychological well-being. Refugees suffer many experiences that can compromise SE. This study tested the impact of enhancing perceived SE on coping with trauma reminders and distress tolerance in tortured refugees.

The conceptualization of emotion regulation difficulties, and its association with posttraumatic stress symptoms in traumatized refugees.

This study investigated the conceptualization of emotion regulation difficulties in a sample of refugees with varying levels of posttraumatic stress (PTS), and examined whether specific emotion regulation difficulties were associated with PTS severity. Refugees were administered an abbreviated version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, the PTSD Symptom Scale - Interview Version, and the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to examine model fit for the 6-factor model originally proposed by the developers of the DERS and the more recently proposed 5-factor model that excludes the awareness subscale.

Participation in psychosocial oncology and quality-of-life research: a systematic review.

Quality-of-life and psychosocial oncology studies that have low participation might have less precision, less statistical power, and can have non-response bias. In this systematic Review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycInfo, for paediatric studies published in 2010-15 and adults studies published 2014-15. Studies were eligible if they were original studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 years at diagnosis) with cancer or their parents, or adult patients with cancer; and assessed psychosocial outcomes, including quality of life, depression, anxiety, wellbeing, distress, coping, or adjustment as a primary or secondary outcome.

Sexual and Romantic Relationships: Experiences of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.

This study examined the quality and satisfaction of sexual/romantic relationships of adolescents/young adults (AYAs) who recently completed cancer treatment. AYAs between 16 and 26 years old (62.5% female) and less than 24 months post-treatment were interviewed using the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS) interview.

Acceptability and feasibility of an e-mental health intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors: "Cascade".

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of "Cascade": an online, group-based, cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, delivered "live" by a psychologist, to assist parents of children who have completed cancer treatment.

Methods: Forty-seven parents were randomized to Cascade (n = 25) or a 6-month waitlist (n = 22). Parents completed questionnaires at baseline, 1-2 weeks and 6 months post-intervention.

Grandparents of children with cancer: a controlled study of distress, support, and barriers to care.

Objective: For families under stress, positive grandparental relationships provide a valued 'safety net'. However, coping with family stressors can place a heavy burden on older individuals who may be experiencing declining health/energy themselves. This mixed-methods study assessed the prevalence of distress in grandparents of children with, and without, cancer, aiming to identify predictors of grandparental distress and quantify their barriers to care.

'What they're not telling you': a new scale to measure grandparents' information needs when their grandchild has cancer.

Objective: To determine the information needs and preferences of grandparents of children with cancer, to identify clinically useful predictors of high information need, and to develop the first validated scale to assess grandparents' information needs regarding their grandchild's cancer.

Methods: Grandparents of children with cancer completed a questionnaire, including a newly developed instrument to measure information needs.

Results: Eighty-seven grandparents participated (mean age 65.

Improving mutation notification when new genetic information is identified in research: a trial of two strategies in familial breast cancer.

Purpose: The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Aspects of Breast Cancer (kConFab) is a large-scale research study that notifies participants when new, personally relevant, information is discovered. In 2009, the (kConFab) instituted an intensive notification process to ensure at-risk individuals were effectively notified. This study (i) evaluated the impact of intensive notification on genetic testing uptake; (ii) identified those most likely to undergo testing postnotification; and (iii) identified those most likely to acknowledge that they had been notified.