Free light chain UV quantification compared with immunochemical measurement: How dimers and monomers may influence the results.

Serum κ and λ free light chain (FLC) levels are important for the management of plasma cell disorders. Immunochemical measurements on automated platforms with different reagents occasionally return different results that make them not interchangeable. The reasons for this behaviour are not clear and it is not known which result is the most accurate.

Inter-assay variability in automated serum free light chain assays and their use in the clinical laboratory.

Serum κ and λ free light chain levels are markers of plasma cell proliferation, and their measurements have been included in recent guidelines by the International Myeloma Working Group for the management of patients with plasma cellular dyscrasias. Five diagnostic methods for the immunochemical quantification of serum free light chains (FLC) are available, three based on polyclonal antibodies (Freelite, The Binding Site; FLC ELISA κ and λ, Sebia; human κ and λ FLC, Diazyme Laboratories) and two on monoclonal antibodies (N Latex FLC, Siemens Healthineers; Seralite, Sebia). Several studies have shown that these methods cannot be used interchangeably for the follow-up of patients because measured κ and λ FLC concentrations may differ significantly, especially at high levels.

Different immunoreactivity of monomers and dimers makes automated free light chains assays not equivalent.

Background The automated immunochemical serum free light chains (FLC) assays, Freelite (a polyclonal antiserum) and N Latex FLC (a mixture of monoclonal antibodies), are not interchangeable, as they may provide different results on a same sample. This study was aimed to establish if the calibrators contain FLC oligomers, and if different reactivity against monomers and dimers contributes to the discrepancy. Methods Gel filtration chromatography fractions of the calibrators were subjected to a Western blot (WB) and analyzed by each reagent.