Decision making in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Recent neuroimaging studies have reported structural and functional brain abnormalities in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), which may also involve cortical and subcortical networks that are important for decision making. This study is the first attempt to examine decision making in JME. Twenty-two patients with JME (median age 26.

Executive functions in chronic mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

There is no consensus as to whether mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) leads to executive function deficits. In this study, we adopted an extensive neuropsychological test battery and assessed different executive functions in chronic, unilateral MTLE. Performance of MTLE patients was compared with that of healthy peers and with normative data.

Decision making under ambiguity in temporal lobe epilepsy: does the location of the underlying structural abnormality matter?

Previous studies have reported decision-making deficits in patients affected by mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The aim of the study described here was to assess the specificity of these deficits by comparing performance of patients with neocortical TLE, patients with mesial TLE, and healthy controls. The mesial TLE group performed lower than healthy controls and the neocortical TLE group in decision making under initial ambiguity.

Decision making under ambiguity and under risk in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

Decision making is essential in everyday life. Though the importance of the mesial temporal lobe in emotional processing and feedback learning is generally recognized, decision making in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is almost unexplored so far. Twenty-eight consecutive epilepsy patients with drug resistant mTLE and fifty healthy controls performed decision tasks under initial ambiguity (participants have to learn by feedback to make advantageous decisions) and under risk (advantageous choices may be made by estimating risks and by rational strategies).

Making decisions and advising decisions in traumatic brain injury.

Objective And Background: Decision under ambiguity and decision under risk are fundamental in every-day life.

Methods: We investigated these 2 types of decision in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients through the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), the Probability-Associated Gambling (PAG) task, and a counsel version of the PAG task. Although in the IGT rules for gain and losses are implicit and probability information is missing, in the PAG task and the counsel task rules are explicit and probabilities are well-defined.

Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.

Old adults have to face many situations that require important decisions. In the present investigation, the authors examined the effects of aging on both decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk. To this purpose, healthy young and old adults completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Probability-Associated Gambling task (PAG task).