Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
April 2024
Animals moving together in groups are believed to interact among each other with effective social forces, such as attraction, repulsion, and alignment. Such forces can be inferred using "force maps," i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe authors studied momentary motion leadership in small groups of black neon tetra (Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrodi) and zebrafish (Danio rerio), its relationship with local interaction parameters, such as the acceleration and turning angle of the individuals, and the relative locations of the individuals within the group. The purpose was to know whether leadership tended to be monopolised by certain individuals or whether it was equitably shared between them and if there were differences in leadership sharing between these two species, which are known to have different degrees of cohesion and polarisation. The authors filmed groups of two, three, four and eight fishes of each species and tracked their individual motion by image analysis and trajectory extraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThere is much evidence, both in humans and rodents, that while navigating males tend to use geometric information whereas females rely more on landmarks. The present work attempts to alter the geometry bias in female rats. In Experiment 1 three groups of female rats were trained in a triangular-shaped pool to find a hidden platform, whose location was defined in terms of two sources of information, a landmark outside the pool and a particular corner of the pool.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe explored the local motion rules used by interacting individuals in small groups of black neon tetra (Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrodi) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) to ascertain if and how these rules underlie the fishes' global collective coordinated motion. As these 2 species show very different styles of collective motion in terms of cohesion and polarization, we expected to find differences in their individual behavioral rules. We recorded groups of 2, 3, 4, and 8 fish of each species; tracked their individual trajectories; and studied how their individual turning angles and accelerations varied as a function of heading differences, distances, and relative angles to their neighbors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFish can gain significant adaptive advantages when living in a group and they exhibit a wide variety of types of collective motion. The scientific literature recognizes 2 main patterns: shoals (aggregations of individuals that remain close to each other), and schools (aggregations of aligned, or polarized, individuals). We analyzed the collective motion of 2 social fish species, zebrafish (Danio rerio) and black neon tetra (Hyphessobrycon herbertaxelrodi), and compared their patterns of movement and the effect of group size and environmental constraints such as water column height and tank geometry on the collective motion of both species.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCoordinated collective motion (CCM) has been recently studied using agent-based simulations by applying three behavioural rules: repulsion, attraction and alignment. But these rules are so similar to the expected group behaviour that it can hardly be labelled emergent. We developed an agent-based model that produces CCM using a set of low-level dyadic interaction rules.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStudying the collective behavior of fishes often requires tracking a great number of individuals. When many fishes move together, it is common for individuals to move so close to each other that some fishes superimpose themselves on others during one or several units of time, which impacts on tracking accuracy (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIn two experiments, male and female rats were trained in a Morris pool in the presence of 1 (Experiment 1) or 2 (Experiment 2) landmarks, which were placed relatively close in relation to a hidden platform. Experiment 1 established the relative salience of 3 landmarks. Two of them revealed a similar salience, and smaller than a third one, the most salient landmark, both in training and on a test trial without the platform.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF