Background: Logistic regression-based signal detection algorithms have benefits over disproportionality analysis due to their ability to handle potential confounders and masking factors. Feature exploration and developing alternative machine learning algorithms can further strengthen signal detection.
Objectives: Our objective was to compare the signal detection performance of logistic regression, gradient-boosted trees, random forest and support vector machine models utilizing Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system data.
Background: Many signal detection algorithms give the same weight to information from all products and patients, which may result in signals being masked or false positives being flagged as potential signals. Subgrouped analysis can be used to help correct for this.
Research Design And Methods: The publicly available US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System quarterly data extract files from 1 January 2015 through 30 September 2017 were utilized.
While many techniques for outlier detection have been proposed in the literature, the interpretation of detected outliers is often left to users. As a result, it is difficult for users to promptly take appropriate actions concerning the detected outliers. To lessen this difficulty, when outliers are identified, they should be presented together with their explanations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF