Purpose: The use of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has steadily increased over the past decade. Recent literature suggests that a larger population may benefit from SSRF, and that the geriatric population-as the highest-risk population-may receive the greatest improvement from these interventions. We sought to determine the overall utilization of SSRF in the United States.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Falling is the most common cause of trauma in the geriatric population. To identify patients that were at-risk for falling, we implemented a provider-directed fall prevention screening initiative in the ambulatory setting of a large tertiary care referral center. We used three clinician-directed questions from the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death and Injuries toolkit.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Use of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has increased. Despite compelling small studies, many centers still struggle with determining criteria for intervention. We investigated the benefit of SSRF in our patients compared with nonoperative (NonOp) National Trauma Databank (NTDB) controls, specifically in the older population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The optimal timing of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) remains debated. We hypothesized that (1) demographic, radiologic, and clinical variables are associated with time to surgery and (2) shorter time to SSRF improves acute outcomes.
Methods: Prospectively collected SSRF databases from four trauma centers were merged and analyzed (2006-2016).
J Trauma Acute Care Surg
December 2017
Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has become pivotal in the management of severe chest injuries. Recent literature supports improved outcomes and mortality in severe fracture and flail chest patients who undergo SSRF compared with nonoperative management (NOM). A 2014 National Trauma Data Bank review provided a point prevalence of 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Nonoperative management (NOM) for blunt splenic injury (BSI) is well-established. Angiography (ANGIO) has been shown to improve success rates with NOM. Protocols for NOM are not standardized and vary widely between centers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Rib fractures (RIBFX) are a common injury and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Using a previously published RIBFX scoring system, we sought to validate the system by applying it to a larger patient population. We hypothesized that the RIBFX scoring system reliably predicts morbidity and mortality in patients with chest wall injury at the time of initial evaluation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are assumed to be at an increased risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). Delay in the initiation of chemoprophylaxis and prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filters have been advocated by some because of concerns for increased intracranial hemorrhage in the presence of prophylactic anticoagulation. We hypothesized that patients with isolated TBI would not be at increased risk for the development of PE compared with the general trauma population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: There is no consensus when the designation of nonoperative management (NOM) for splenic injury (BSI) should start. We evaluated NOM success rates based on different time points after admission.
Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank was evaluated for BSI for the year 2008.
Nonoperative management (NOM) for blunt splenic trauma (BST) is an established practice. The impact of splenic embolization (SE) in the algorithm for NOM has not been well studied. This study evaluates the role of SE and spleen injury grade on failure of NOM.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Prolonged intensive care unit lengths of stay (ICU LOS) for critical illness can have acceptable mortality rates and quality of life despite significant costs. Only a few studies have specifically addressed prolonged ICU LOS after trauma. Our goals were to examine characteristics and outcomes of trauma patients with LOS >or= 30 days, predictors of prolonged stay and mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: This study aimed to analyze the relation of hyperglycemia to outcome in cases of severe traumatic brain injury, and to examine factors that may be responsible for the hyperglycemic state.
Methods: A retrospective analysis in an intensive care unit of a level 1 trauma center investigated 77 patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 8 or lower who survived more than 5 days were reviewed.
Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be compounded by physiologic derangements that produce secondary brain injury. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the frequency with which physiologic factors that are associated with secondary brain injury occur in patients with severe closed head injuries and to determine the impact of these factors on outcome.
Methods: The records of 81 adult blunt trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < or = 8 and transport times < 2 hours to a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed searching for the following 11 secondary brain injury factors (SBIFs) in the first 24 hours postinjury: hypotension, hypoxia, hypercapnia, hypocapnia, hypothermia, hyperthermia, metabolic acidosis, seizures, coagulopathy, hyperglycemia, and intracranial hypertension.