Expert reasoning in psychotherapy case formulation.

Therapist reasoning in case formulation construction was investigated. Sixty-five psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioral therapists classified as experts, experienced, or novices generated "think aloud" formulations based on six standardized vignettes. Formulations were reliably transcribed, segmented into idea units, and content coded.

Generic psychotherapy case formulation training improves formulation quality.

Psychotherapy case formulations written by 20 clinicians who received a 2-hr training session in case formulation were compared with those of 23 clinicians not receiving training. Formulations based on intake interviews conducted at a university-based psychiatric outpatient clinic, two to three per clinician, were reliably coded for quality and content. Clinicians in the training group produced formulations rated as higher in overall quality and as more elaborated, comprehensive, complex, and precise.

The quality of psychotherapy case formulations: a comparison of expert, experienced, and novice cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapists.

Sixty-five expert, experienced, and novice cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic psychotherapists provided "think aloud" case formulations in response to 6 standardized patient vignettes varying in disorder and prototypicality. The 390 formulations were reliably transcribed, segmented into idea units, content coded, and rated on multiple dimensions of quality. As hypothesized, the formulations of experts were more comprehensive, elaborated, complex, and systematic.