Frostbite causes tissue damage through five major mechanisms, out of which two are amenable to treatment. The first-line treatment is rapid rewarming therapy using water at 40°C to 42°C, which addresses the formation of ice crystals in the intra and extra cellular compartments. The second mechanism is progressive tissue ischemia after rewarming and is only accessible to a second-line therapy represented by thrombolysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFree flap reconstruction in acute burns has high failure rates, relating mainly to a systemic inflammatory state. The "vulnerable phase" can last for 6 weeks after burn and can cause thrombosis of the flap microcirculation with patent arterial and venous anastomoses. Revision surgery alone may be unsuccessful, but thrombolysis can lead to flap salvage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiofilm forms when bacteria surrounded by an extracellular matrix aggregate on a surface. It can develop on many surfaces, including wound dressings; this can be particularly nefarious for burn patients undergoing skin grafting (autograft) for burn wound coverage as they often suffer from compromised immune system function. Autograft donor sites are particularly vulnerable to biofilm formation; as such, timely healing of these sites is essential.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNegative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represents one of the many solutions for complex wounds of the upper extremity. The goal of this study was to investigate the most common indications for definitive treatment of wound defects in the upper extremity with NPWT and to report revision surgery outcomes after its use. A systematic review of the literature was performed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Skin coverage remains a significant hurdle in large-sized burns. Recent advances have allowed to grow Bilaminar Cultured Skin Autografts (BCSGs) from patients' own donor sites. The aim of this study was to report long-term outcomes in patients with large-sized burns having received BCSGs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe authors report the case of a 30-year-old male with 52% TBSA high-voltage electrical injury of the upper half of the body. Injuries included a cervical burn with associated alteration of the left brachial plexus as well as extensive soft tissue burn of the right hand. Three months later, he developed osteomyelitis of the right thumb metacarpal bone requiring amputation proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: Midfacial distraction for facial stenosis is minimizing the communication between cranial fossa and nasal fossa caused by the Le Fort III osteotomy during frontofacial advancement procedures. There are different types of distractors, such as internal and external devices. The aim of our study is to present a series of 22 consecutive distraction cases operated without any Le Fort osteotomy with external distraction frames.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: During the 1970s, frontofacial advancement revolutionized the treatment of severe facial stenosis. Unfortunately, this method was associated with significant morbidity due to the Le Fort III osteotomy, which creates a major communication between the frontocranial dead space and the nasal fossae. Midfacial distraction improves the complication rate by diminishing the size of this gap.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF