GluN1 and GluN2A NMDA Receptor Subunits Increase in the Hippocampus during Memory Consolidation in the Rat.

It is widely accepted that NMDA receptors (NMDAR) are required for learning and memory formation, and for synaptic plasticity induction. We have previously shown that hippocampal GluN1 and GluN2A NMDAR subunits significantly increased following habituation of rats to an open field (OF), while GluN2B remained unchanged. Similar results were obtained after CA1-long-term potentiation (LTP) induction in rat hippocampal slices.

Amnesia of inhibitory avoidance by scopolamine is overcome by previous open-field exposure.

The muscarinic cholinergic receptor (MAChR) blockade with scopolamine either extended or restricted to the hippocampus, before or after training in inhibitory avoidance (IA) caused anterograde or retrograde amnesia, respectively, in the rat, because there was no long-term memory (LTM) expression. Adult Wistar rats previously exposed to one or two open-field (OF) sessions of 3 min each (habituated), behaved as control animals after a weak though over-threshold training in IA. However, after OF exposure, IA LTM was formed and expressed in spite of an extensive or restricted to the hippocampus MAChR blockade.

Hippocampal NMDA receptors and the previous experience effect on memory.

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) are thought to be responsible for switching synaptic activity specific patterns into long-term changes in synaptic function and structure, which would support learning and memory. Hippocampal NMDAR blockade impairs memory consolidation in rodents, while NMDAR stimulation improves it. Adult rats that explored twice an open field (OF) before a weak though overthreshold training in inhibitory avoidance (IA), expressed IA long-term memory in spite of the hippocampal administration of MK-801, which currently leads to amnesia.

A novel dihydro-pyrazolo(3,4d)(1,2,4)triazolo(1,5a)pyrimidin-4-one (AJ23) is an antagonist at adenosine A(1) receptors and enhances consolidation of step-down avoidance.

Adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists are of potential value in the treatment of cognitive dysfunction. We have developed compound AJ23 (7-methyl-1-phenyl-1,8-dihydro-pyrazolo-(3,4d)(1,2,4)-triazolo(1,5a)-pyrimidin-4-one) as a novel, non-xanthine based antagonist at A(1) receptors. It has micromolar affinity at human A(1) receptors with a 45-fold selectivity for A(1) over A(2A) receptors and little affinity for many other receptors and transporters tested in a screening panel.

Memory impairment in rats by hippocampal administration of the serine protease subtilisin.

Since the serine protease subtilisin has been reported to generate a novel form of long-term depression (LTD) in rat hippocampal slices, the present work was designed to determine whether it has any effect on learning and memory processes. Rats were used to examine the effects of subtilisin, injected directly into the dorsal hippocampus, on task performance in a step-through inhibitory avoidance of a mild footshock. The administration of 100 ng of subtilisin into each hippocampus, immediately after training, was sufficient to induce a detectable learning deficit with a footshock stimulus of 0.

Muscarinic inhibition of hippocampal and striatal adenylyl cyclase is mainly due to the M(4) receptor.

The five muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M(1)-M(5)) are differentially expressed in the brain. M(2) and M(4) are coupled to inhibition of stimulated adenylyl cyclase, while M(1), M(3) and M(5) are mainly coupled to the phosphoinositide pathway. We studied the muscarinic receptor regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity in the rat hippocampus, compared to the striatum and amygdala.

M4 muscarinic receptors are involved in modulation of neurotransmission at synapses of Schaffer collaterals on CA1 hippocampal neurons in rats.

All five subtypes of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR; M(1)-M(5)) are expressed in the hippocampus, where they are involved both in cognitive functions and in synaptic plasticity, such as long-term potentiation (LTP). Muscarinic toxins (MTs) are small proteins from mamba snake venoms that display exquisite discrimination between mAChRs. MT1 acts as an agonist at M(1) and an antagonist at M(4) receptors, with similar affinities for both.

Facilitatory effect of the intra-hippocampal pre-test administration of MT3 in the inhibitory avoidance task.

The cholinergic system plays a crucial role in learning and memory. Modulatory mechanisms of this system in the acquisition and consolidation processes have been extensively studied, but their participation in the memory retrieval process is still poorly understood. Conventional pharmacological agents are not highly selective for particular muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes.

Effects of muscarinic toxins MT1 and MT2 from green mamba on different muscarinic cholinoceptors.

MT1 and MT2, polypeptides from green mamba venom, known to bind to muscarinic cholinoceptors, behave like muscarinic agonists in an inhibitory avoidance task in rats. We have further characterised their functional effects using different preparations. MT1 and MT2 behaved like relatively selective muscarinic M1 receptor agonists in rabbit vas deferens, but their effects were not reversed by washing or prevented by muscarinic antagonists, although allosteric modulators altered responses to MT1.

Role of hippocampal M1 and M4 muscarinic receptor subtypes in memory consolidation in the rat.

Muscarinic receptors in the hippocampus are relevant to learning and memory, but the role of each subtype is poorly understood. Muscarinic toxins (MTs) from Dendroaspis snakes venom are selective for muscarinic receptor subtypes. MT2, a selective agonist for M(1) receptors, given into the hippocampus immediately after training, improved memory consolidation of an inhibitory avoidance task in rats, whereas the antagonist pirenzepine was amnestic, supporting a facilitatory role of M(1) receptors.