Critical Anti-Racist Discourse Analysis Applied to Federally Qualified Health Center Policy.

Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) seek to improve health equity for marginalized and historically disenfranchised communities. However, FQHC policies are not necessarily designed to be explicitly anti-racist. This can result in institutional racism shaping and influencing policy.

At what risk? A research note on interviewer burden.

Background: We report on our methodological experiences during an investigation of how institutional racism functions in healthcare. We found tension between balancing methodological rigor with the unanticipated consequence of interviewer burden.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients.

In pursuit of high-quality primary care: A call to action to implement the objectives of the 2021 NASEM report.

A seminal National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine consensus report released in May 2021--emphasizes the importance of ensuring that high-quality primary care is accessible to all people, regardless of whether they have paid for it and in spite of its limited availability. This report outlines five recommendations for primary care stakeholders seeking to transform the health care landscape. This article summarizes these recommendations; identifies progress made toward high-quality primary care implementation since the report's publication; and outlines examples of policies, operational approaches, and advocacy strategies we believe are necessary to implement high-quality primary care.

Wearable fitness tracker use in federally qualified health center patients: strategies to improve the health of all of us using digital health devices.

As the use of connected devices rises, an understanding of how digital health technologies can be used for equitable healthcare across diverse communities is needed. We surveyed 1007 adult patients at six Federally Qualified Health Centers regarding wearable fitness trackers. Findings indicate the majority interest in having fitness trackers.

Measuring meaning and peace with the FACIT-spiritual well-being scale: distinction without a difference?

The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp; Peterman, Fitchett, Brady, Hernandez, & Cella, 2002) has become a widely used measure of spirituality; however, there remain questions about its specific factor structure and the validity of scores from its separate scales. Specifically, it remains unclear whether the Meaning and Peace scales denote distinct factors. The present study addresses previous limitations by examining the extent to which the Meaning and Peace scales relate differentially to a variety of physical and mental health variables across 4 sets of data from adults with a number of chronic health conditions.