Publications by authors named "E Salame"

Objective: Ampullary neoplastic lesions can be resected by endoscopic papillectomy (EP) or transduodenal surgical ampullectomy (TSA) while pancreaticoduodenectomy is reserved for more advanced lesions. We present the largest retrospective comparative study analysing EP and TSA.

Design: Of all patients in the database, lesions with prior interventions, benign histology advanced malignancy (T2 and more), patients with hereditary syndromes and those undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aim: During low anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer, a protective ileostomy (PI) is routinely created to reduce the severity of anastomotic complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the side-effects of PI during adjuvant chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients was operated on for non-metastatic rectal cancer with a PI during 2005-2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Curative management of retroperitoneal sarcoma relies on surgery, and complete monoblock resection is one of the main prognostic factors. The goal of this study was to search predictive factors for incomplete resection.

Methods: All patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma in two University hospitals between 2010 and 202 were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite the increasing efficacy of chemotherapy, permanently unresectable colorectal liver metastases are associated with poor long-term survival. We aimed to assess whether liver transplantation plus chemotherapy could improve overall survival.

Methods: TransMet was a multicentre, open-label, prospective, randomised controlled trial done in 20 tertiary centres in Europe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is assumed that robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) may facilitate complex pelvic dissection for rectal cancer compared to the laparoscopic-assisted resection (LAR). The aim of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity, short- and long-term oncologic, and functional outcomes between the RAS and LAR approaches.

Methods: Between 2015 and 2021, all rectal cancers operated on by (LAR) or (RAS) were retrospectively reviewed in two colorectal surgery centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF