From Chrysalis to Taking Flight, the Metamorphosis of the ACGME During Dr Thomas Nasca's Tenure as CEO.

Thomas J. Nasca, MD, MACP, served as the President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for 17 years, with his tenure ending December 2024. During this time he led and supported significant changes in accreditation and medical education.

Investigating the Roles and Impact of Clinical Competency Committees in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review.

Although Clinical Competency Committees (CCCs) were implemented to facilitate the goals of competency-based medical education, implementation has been variable, and we do not know if and how these committees affected programs and assessment in graduate medical education (GME). To explore the roles CCCs fulfill in GME and their effect on trainees, faculty, and programs. We conducted a narrative review of CCC primary research with the following inclusion criteria: all articles must be research in nature, focused on GME and specifically studying CCCs, and published in English language journals from January 2013 to November 2022.

Predicting Performance in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Part II Certification Oral Examination Based On Milestone Ratings.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced the Milestones to document learner development within a competency-based framework. On the other hand, board certifying examinations serve as a summative evaluation of a learner's readiness for independent medical practice. Scores in Part I of the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) examination, which measures medical knowledge, has been shown to correlate only with Milestones ratings in medical knowledge.

The Next Era of Assessment Within Medical Education: Exploring Intersections of Context and Implementation.

In competency-based medical education (CBME), which is being embraced globally, the patient-learner-educator encounter occurs in a highly complex context which contributes to a wide range of assessment outcomes. Current and historical barriers to considering context in assessment include the existing post-positivist epistemological stance that values objectivity and validity evidence over the variability introduced by context. This is most evident in standardized testing.

Are They Prepared? Comparing Intern Milestone Performance of Accelerated 3-Year and 4-Year Medical Graduates.

Purpose: Accelerated 3-year programs (A3YPs) at medical schools were developed to address student debt and mitigate workforce shortage issues. This study investigated whether medical school length (3 vs 4 years) was associated with early residency performance. The primary research question was as follows: Are the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones (MS) attained by A3YP graduates comparable to graduates of traditional 4-year programs (T4YPs) at 6 and 12 months into internship?

Method: The MS data from students entering U.