Simplified expressions of uncertainty for single number quantities in ISO 3382-3 (2022).

The ISO 3382-3 (2022) standard defines single number quantities (SNQs) characterizing the spatial decay of speech (D2S, LpAS4m, rC) and of its intelligibility (rD). The standard assesses the accuracy of the measurement using a unique uncertainty value for each SNQ, relying on a round-robin test performed in a single office. To make this assessment more accurate, analytical expressions have been established by applying the law of propagation of uncertainty.

Vocal and semantic cues for the segregation of long concurrent speech stimuli in diotic and dichotic listening-The Long-SWoRD test.

It is not always easy to follow a conversation in a noisy environment. To distinguish between two speakers, a listener must mobilize many perceptual and cognitive processes to maintain attention on a target voice and avoid shifting attention to the background noise. The development of an intelligibility task with long stimuli-the Long-SWoRD test-is introduced.

Behavioral Account of Attended Stream Enhances Neural Tracking.

During the past decade, several studies have identified electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates of selective auditory attention to speech. In these studies, typically, listeners are instructed to focus on one of two concurrent speech streams (the "target"), while ignoring the other (the "masker"). EEG signals are recorded while participants are performing this task, and subsequently analyzed to recover the attended stream.

Assessment of helicopter passengers' vibration discomfort: proposal for improvement of the ISO 2631-1 standard.

High levels of vibration exist in helicopters and manufacturers are seeking to quantify vibration discomfort. They use the ISO 2631-1 standard, proposed for all types of transport. This study aimed to verify the validity of this index in the specific case of helicopters.

Two laboratory methods of assessing annoyance due to railway noise and vibration.

In laboratory experiments, total annoyance due to combined noise and vibration and partial annoyances due to each source in the presence of the other can be assessed in two ways: during separate sessions dedicated to the evaluation of each kind of annoyance, and during the same session. This letter examines the difference between annoyance responses provided by the two methods. No differences were found between partial (respectively, total) annoyance responses measured during separate sessions and those measured during the same session.