Publications by authors named "E Martinez-Bauer"

Aim: To compare the impact of an unrestricted diet with a 3-day low-residue diet before colonoscopy on bowel preparation quality.

Methods: A randomized, multicenter, researcher-blinded, parallel-group feasibility trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of an unrestricted diet versus a 3-day low-residue diet for colonoscopy preparation. Participants, aged 50 to 69, were enrolled in a colorectal cancer screening program with no factors linked to poor bowel cleansing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In colonoscopy, preparation is often regarded as the most burdensome part of the intervention. Traditionally, specific diets have been recommended, but the evidence to support this policy is insufficient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the decision not to follow a restrictive diet on bowel preparation and colonoscopy outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (ALGIB) is a common cause of hospitalization. Recent guidelines recommend the use of prognostic scales for risk stratification. However, it remains unclear whether risk scores are more accurate than some simpler prognostic variables.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The major limitation of piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the inaccurate histological assessment of the resected specimen, especially in cases of submucosal invasion.

Objective: To classify non-pedunculated lesions ≥20 mm based on endoscopic morphological features, in order to identify those that present intramucosal neoplasia (includes low-grade neoplasia and high-grade neoplasia) and are suitable for piecemeal EMR.

Design: A post-hoc analysis from an observational prospective multicentre study conducted by 58 endoscopists at 17 academic and community hospitals was performed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We aimed to assess the risk of cancer in patients with abdominal symptoms after a complete colonoscopy without colorectal cancer (CRC), according to the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration, as well as its diagnostic accuracy. For this purpose, we performed a post-hoc analysis within a cohort of 1431 patients from the COLONPREDICT study, prospectively designed to assess the fecal immunochemical test accuracy in detecting CRC. Over 36.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF