Multidisciplinary considerations for implementing Bayesian borrowing in basket trials.

Drug development has historically relied on phase I-III clinical trials including participants sharing the same disease. However, drug development has evolved as the discovery of mechanistic drivers of disease demonstrated that the same therapeutic target may provide benefits across different diseases. A basket trial condenses evaluation of one therapy among multiple related diseases into a single trial and presents an opportunity to borrow information across them rather than viewing each in isolation.

Defining estimands for efficacy assessment in single arm phase 1b or phase 2 clinical trials in oncology early development.

The addendum of the ICH E9 guideline on the statistical principles for clinical trials introduced the estimand framework. The framework is designed to strengthen the dialog between different stakeholders, to introduce greater clarity in the clinical trial objectives and to provide alignment between the estimand and statistical analysis. Estimand framework related publications thus far have mainly focused on randomized clinical trials.

Comprehensive clinical pharmacology characterization of AZD4635 in healthy participants to support dosing considerations.

Aims: Two phase 1 studies characterized the oral bioavailability of AZD4635 (potential anticancer therapy) and factors that may influence its pharmacokinetics (PKs; food, smoking, proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs] and CYP1A2 inhibitors) to support continued clinical development of AZD4635.

Methods: Study 1 (comparative PK study; nonsmokers) consists of Part A and Part B. Participants (fasted) in Part A were administered 50 mg of AZD4635 either as nanosuspension or capsule.

Phase Ia/b, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of AZD4635 (an Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist) as Monotherapy or Combined with Durvalumab, in Patients with Solid Tumors.

Purpose: To evaluate AZD4635, an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Patients And Methods: In phase Ia (dose escalation), patients had relapsed/refractory solid tumors; in phase Ib (dose expansion), patients had checkpoint inhibitor-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer with prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure, or other solid tumors (checkpoint-naïve or prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure). Patients received AZD4635 monotherapy (75-200 mg once daily or 125 mg twice daily) or in combination with durvalumab (AZD4635 75 or 100 mg once daily).

Calibration of laboratory derived indices for non-target arthropod risk assessment with field data for plant protection products.

The Hazard Quotient (HQ) compares field application rate to intrinsic toxicity assessed with sensitive indicator species. As a hazard indicator for risk assessment, the HQ must be calibrated against measured effects under field conditions. Because protection goals may be context specific, we analyse how choice of acceptance criteria affects setting of the HQ and calibrate HQ for various scenarios under the strict condition that no false negative conclusions may be reached.