Publications by authors named "E Gilkerson"

Efalizumab is a humanized monoclonal CD11a antibody approved for treatment of psoriasis. Its immunomodulatory effects led us study how immune responses are modified and the possible consequences for vaccinations in clinical practice. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 12 weeks of subcutaneous efalizumab treatment of patients with moderate psoriasis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BAFF (also known as BLyS), a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily, plays a critical role in the maturation and development of B cells. BAFF has three receptors on B cells, the most crucial of which is BR3. In this study, we demonstrate the biological outcome of BAFF blockade in cynomolgus monkeys using a soluble fusion protein consisting of human BR3 and human IgG1 Fc.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A method has been validated, according to the Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), for precise quantitation of the biological activity of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) for lot release testing. The assay is based on the survival of a subclone of rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells (PC12-CF) in response to rhNGF. Cell survival is measured by monitoring the reduction, by living cells, of the alamarBlue dye into a red form which is highly fluorescent.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is indicated for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction as a dose of up to 100 mg. Several clinical trials have suggested that higher patency rates can be achieved with a rapid drug administration. A study was conducted in rabbits to determine whether pharmacokinetics provides an explanation for the higher patency rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We describe an evaluation of four ELISA methods, including three commercial kits, for measuring recombinant and natural human interferon-g (hIFN-g). Using a panel of samples, including well-characterized reference standards, we compared relative quantification between assays, within assays and, where possible, the absolute accuracy of quantification as compared to other analytical methods. The four assays generated markedly different results; up to an almost 60-fold difference between the highest and lowest values for one sample.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF