A 2024 Update on US FDA Implementation of Partial Area Under the Curve Into Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Assessments.

Comparisons of maximum drug concentration (C) and total area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC) may be inadequate for bioavailability (BA)/bioequivalence (BE) assessments in cases where the shape of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of a drug impacts the clinical performance. In such cases, partial area under the concentration vs.

Driving Efficiency: Leveraging Model-Informed Approaches in 505(b)(2) Regulatory Actions.

Introduced by the Hatch-Waxman Amendments of 1984, 505(b)(2) applications permit the US Food and Drug Administration to rely, for approval of a new drug application, on information from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. This pathway is designed to circumvent the unnecessary duplication of studies already conducted on a previously approved drug. It can lead to a considerably more efficient and expedited route to approval compared to a traditional development path.

Antioxidants had No Effects on the In-Vitro Permeability of BCS III Model Drug Substances.

Reformulation with addition of antioxidants is one potential mitigation strategy to prevent or reduce nitrosamine drug substance-related impurities (NDSRIs) in drug products. To explore whether there could be other approaches to demonstrate bioequivalence for a reformulated oral product, which typically needs in vivo bioequivalence studies to support the changes after approval, the effects of antioxidant on the in vitro permeability of BCS III model drug substances were investigated to see whether there could be any potential impact on drug absorption. Six antioxidants were screened and four (ascorbic acid, cysteine, α-tocopherol and propyl gallate) were selected based on their nitrosamine inhibition efficiencies.

International Anal Neoplasia Society's consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening.

The International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) developed consensus guidelines to inform anal cancer screening use among various high-risk groups. Anal cancer incidence estimates by age among risk groups provided the basis to identify risk thresholds to recommend screening. Guided by risk thresholds, screening initiation at age 35 years was recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) with HIV.