An integrated evaluation of bioenhanced in situ LNAPL dissolution.

Performance evaluation of in situ bioremediation processes in the field is difficult due to uncertainty created by matrix and contaminant heterogeneity, inaccessibility to direct observation, expense of sampling, and limitations of some measurements. The goal of this research was to develop a strategy for evaluating in situ bioremediation of light nonaqueous-phase liquid (LNAPL) contamination and demonstrating the occurrence of bioenhanced LNAPL dissolution by: (1) integrating a suite of analyses into a rational evaluation strategy; and (2) demonstrating the strategy's application in intermediate-scale flow-cell (ISFC) experiments simulating an aquifer contaminated with a pool of LNAPL (naphthalene dissolved in dodecane). Two ISFCs were operated to evaluate how the monitored parameters changed between a "no bioremediation" scenario and an "intrinsic in situ bioremediation" scenario.

Predictions of bioenhancement of nonaqueous phase liquid ganglia dissolution using first- and zero-order biokinetic models.

The bioenhanced dissolution of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) contaminants that occurs as a result of an increased concentration gradient is influenced by several factors, including the biokinetics. This is important because available data suggest that at typical NAPL source zone concentrations, descriptions of dissolution bioenhancement may require kinetic expressions ranging from first- to zero-order. In this work, an analytical model for the bioenhancement factor, E, is developed for NAPL ganglia dissolution with zero-order kinetics, and compared to a model for E with first-order kinetics.

Laboratory-scale in situ bioremediation in heterogeneous porous media: biokinetics-limited scenario.

Subsurface heterogeneities influence interfacial mass-transfer processes and affect the application of in situ bioremediation by impacting the availability of substrates to the microorganisms. However, for difficult-to-degrade compounds, and/or cases with inhibitory biodegradation conditions, slow biokinetics may also limit the overall bioremediation rate, or be as limiting as mass-transfer processes. In this work, a quantitative framework based on a set of dimensionless coefficients was used to capture the effects of the competing interfacial and biokinetic processes and define the overall rate-limiting process.

A quantitative framework for understanding complex interactions between competing interfacial processes and in situ biodegradation.

In situ bioremediation of contaminated groundwater is made technologically challenging by the physically, chemically, and biologically heterogeneous subsurface environment. Subsurface heterogeneities are important because of influences on interfacial mass transfer processes that impact the availability of substrates to microorganisms. The goal of this study was to perform a "proof-of-concept" evaluation of the utility of a quantitative framework based on a set of dimensionless coefficients for evaluating the effects of competing physicochemical interfacial and biokinetic processes at the field scale.

Effects of temperature on bacterial transport and destruction in bioretention media: field and laboratory evaluations.

Microbial activities are significantly influenced by temperature. This study investigated the effects of temperature on the capture and destruction of bacteria from urban stormwater runoff in bioretention media using 2-year field evaluations coupled with controlled laboratory column studies. Field data from two bioretention cells show that the concentration of indicator bacteria (fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli) was reduced during most storm events, and that the probability of meeting specific water quality criteria in the discharge was increased.