The implementation of design methodologies for supporting shared decision making in healthcare services: A systematic review.

Objectives: This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways.

Methods: Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines.

Results: were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients.

Patient and Staff Experience of Remote Patient Monitoring-What to Measure and How: Systematic Review.

Background: Patient and staff experience is a vital factor to consider in the evaluation of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions. However, no comprehensive overview of available RPM patient and staff experience-measuring methods and tools exists.

Objective: This review aimed at obtaining a comprehensive set of experience constructs and corresponding measuring instruments used in contemporary RPM research and at proposing an initial set of guidelines for improving methodological standardization in this domain.

From digital health to learning health systems: four approaches to using data for digital health design.

Digital health technologies, powered by digital data, provide an opportunity to improve the efficacy and efficiency of health systems at large. However, little is known about different approaches to the use of data for digital health design, or about their possible relations to system-level dynamics. In this contribution, we identify four existing approaches to the use of data for digital health design, namely the silent, the overt, the data-enabled, and the convergent.

The bigger picture of shared decision making: A service design perspective using the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer as a case.

Purpose: Solutions to improve the implementation of shared decision making (SDM) in oncology often focus on the consultation, with limited effects. In this study, we used a service design perspective on the care path of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to understand how experiences of patients, their significant others, and medical professionals over the entire care path accumulate to support their ability to participate in SDM.

'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design.

Typicality and novelty have often been shown to be related to aesthetic preference of human artefacts. Since a typical product is rarely new and, conversely, a novel product will not often be designated as typical, the positive effects of both features seem incompatible. In three studies it was shown that typicality (operationalized as 'goodness of example') and novelty are jointly and equally effective in explaining the aesthetic preference of consumer products, but that they suppress each other's effect.