Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To compare patterns in opioid usage and prescriptions between patients who undergo cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LF) vs cervical laminoplasty with reconstruction (LP) within single surgeon and national database cohorts.
Methods: We identified patients with cervical myelopathy undergoing primary LF or LP in both a single-surgeon series cohort (2004-2018) and a nationally representative cohort drawn from the IBM Marketscan database (2014-2016).
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LF) and cervical laminoplasty with reconstruction (LP) are associated with different rates C5 palsy (C5P) at 1-month follow-up in a single surgeon and nationally representative cohort.
Summary Of Background Data: LF and LP both carry a well-known risk of nerve root injury that most commonly presents as C5P which can reduce patient satisfaction, patient function, and impede patient recovery.
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are traditionally used to track recovery of patients after spine surgery. Wearable accelerometers have adjunctive value because of the continuous, granular, and objective data they provide. We conducted a prospective study of lumbar laminectomy patients to determine if time-series data from wearable accelerometers could delineate phases of recovery and compare accelerometry data to PROMs during recovery tracking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTelehealth drastically reduces the time burden of appointments and increases access to care for homebound patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many outpatient practices closed, requiring an expansion of telemedicine capabilities. However, a significant number of patients remain unconnected to telehealth-capable patient portals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOf Background Data: Cervical spine injuries commonly occur during athletic play, and such injuries carry significant risk for adverse sequelae if not properly managed. Although guidelines for managing return to play exist, adherence among spine surgeons has not been thoroughly examined.
Study Design: Prospective analysis of survey data collected from surgeon members of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) and the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS).
Introduction: Alternative payment models in total lower extremity joint replacement (TJR) increasingly emphasize patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to link the latter to value-based payments. It is unclear to what extent demographic, psychosocial, and clinical characteristics are related to PROs measured preoperatively with the commonly used Hip/Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS/KOOS) and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) questionnaires. We aim to identify (1) the preoperative relationship between HOOS/KOOS and VR-12 scores and several demographic, psychosocial, and clinical patient characteristics and (2) the best modifiable factors for optimization, which may result in improved baseline PROs before TJR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: With the advent of mandatory bundle payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA), assessing patients' risk for increased 90-day complications and resource utilization is crucial. This study assesses the degree to which preoperative patient-reported outcomes predict 90-day complications, episode costs, and utilization in TJA patients.
Methods: All TJA cases in 2017 at 2 high-volume hospitals were queried.