Background: Since the long-acting beta(2)-agonist bronchodilator, formoterol, first became available for the treatment of subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), generic forms of this agent have been launched in a variety of devices. It is timely to review the characteristics of the original dry powder delivery device, the single-dose Aerolizer, its in vitro performance and its comparability with other inhaler devices that are now available for delivery of formoterol.
Scope: This review focuses on the performance of the formoterol Aerolizer inhaler in comparison with other inhalers.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
September 2006
Background: Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common, particularly in children.
Objectives: To compare the protective effect of single doses of formoterol fumarate via Aerolizer with placebo and albuterol in children with EIB.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 23 children (aged 4-11 years) received formoterol, 12 or 24 microg; albuterol, 180 microg; or placebo at 4 separate visits.
Study Objectives: The primary objective was to determine whether high-dose formoterol, 24 mug bid, was associated with more asthma exacerbations compared with lower formoterol doses in patients with stable persistent asthma. Serious asthma exacerbations (life threatening or requiring hospitalization) were the primary end point. Secondary end points included significant exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, all exacerbations, and changes in FEV1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Aerosol Med
May 2005
The Certihaler is a new multi-dose dry powder inhaler for the delivery of formoterol (Foradil), a long-acting beta(2)-agonist. This dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of formoterol 5, 10, 15 and 30 microg and placebo administered via the Certihaler or formoterol 12 microg via a single-dose dry powder inhaler (Aerolizer) in children with persistent asthma. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, incomplete block crossover, dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOver 500 children with asthma, aged 5-12 years, have been treated with formoterol fumarate (Foradil) delivered via the Aerolizer dry powder inhaler in clinical trials, with treatment periods of up to 15 months. In pivotal double-blind trials, two dose levels, 12 and 24 microg taken twice daily, provided significant benefit in terms of lung function measurements and symptom control (a lower dose of 6 microg twice daily appeared insufficient with this formulation). The higher, 24 microg dose appeared to provide an additional margin of benefit in a subgroup of children with more unstable/severe disease when the results from long-term follow-up (12-15 months) were analysed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The long-term efficacy and safety of formoterol dry powder capsules for inhalation in pediatric asthma have not previously been evaluated.
Objective: We examined the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol over a period of 12 months in asthmatic children who were still symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory treatment.
Methods: After a run-in period, 518 patients (5 to 12 years old) were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 12 or 24 microg formoterol dry powder (Foradil, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) or placebo twice daily for 12 months.
Objectives: To compare the onset and magnitude of bronchodilation after dry powder inhalations of formoterol fumarate (Foradil Aerolizer) versus salmeterol xinofoate (Serevent Diskus) with respect to normalized (*) forced expiratory volume in 1 s area under the curve 0 to 1 h after inhalation (FEV1 AUC*0-1 h).
Design: A double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre, randomized, placebo controlled, single-dose, five-period crossover study.
Setting: Five centres in four countries - one centre each in France, Greece and Italy, and two centres in the Netherlands.
Study Objective: To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of therapy with formoterol and oral slow-release theophylline (THEO) in patients with COPD.
Design: A randomized, parallel-group study, with double-blind arms for formoterol and placebo (PL) and an open arm for oral slow-release THEO administered in individual doses on the basis of plasma concentrations.
Setting: Eighty-one centers worldwide.