Publications by authors named "David W Franklin"

Article Synopsis
  • The central nervous system has a mechanism to adapt the gain of short-latency reflexes based on prior movement, enhancing both energy efficiency and stability in motor actions.
  • A study involving human participants rotating their elbow or shoulder joints found that reflex gains could be modulated with joint-specific precision, persisting for hundreds of milliseconds after movement stopped.
  • Serotonin plays a role in setting overall reflex gains across joints, but the specific adaptation mechanism is independent of serotonin and remains unidentified, suggesting a unique spinal circuit geared for environmental adaptation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In daily life, we coordinate both simultaneous and sequential bimanual movements to manipulate objects. Our ability to rapidly account for different object dynamics suggests there are neural mechanisms to quickly deal with them. Here we investigate how actions of one arm can serve as a contextual cue for the other arm and facilitate adaptation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The force developed by actively lengthened muscle depends on different structures across different scales of lengthening. For small perturbations, the active response of muscle is well captured by a linear-time-invariant (LTI) system: a stiff spring in parallel with a light damper. The force response of muscle to longer stretches is better represented by a compliant spring that can fix its end when activated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Activities like ball bouncing and trampoline jumping showcase the human ability to intuitively tune to system dynamics and excite motions that the system prefers intrinsically. This human sensitivity to resonance has been experimentally supported for interactions with simple linear systems but remains a challenge to validate in more complex scenarios where nonlinear dynamics cannot be predicted analytically. However, it has been found that many nonlinear systems exhibit periodic orbits similar to the eigenmodes of linear systems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Motor learning occurs through multiple mechanisms, including unsupervised, supervised (error based), and reinforcement (reward based) learning. Although studies have shown that reward leads to an overall better motor adaptation, the specific processes by which reward influences adaptation are still unclear. Here, we examine how the presence of reward affects dual adaptation to novel dynamics and distinguish its influence on implicit and explicit learning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The human sensorimotor control system excels at adapting between tasks that require both strength and precision, like lifting a sewing machine and threading a needle.
  • It faces significant challenges due to the complexity of controlling a nonlinear neuromuscular system amidst environmental uncertainties and communication delays within the body.
  • The text reviews the mechanisms behind motor control, including movement laws, and discusses sensory input, planning, and muscle function that work together to maintain skilled motor performance, while suggesting future research avenues in this area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bimanual movements are fundamental components of everyday actions, yet the underlying mechanisms coordinating adaptation of the two hands remain unclear. Although previous studies highlighted the contextual effect of kinematics of both arms on internal model formation, we do not know how the sensorimotor control system associates the learned memory with the experienced states in bimanual movements. More specifically, can, and if so, how, does the sensorimotor control system combine multiple states from different effectors to create and adapt a motor memory? Here, we tested motor memory formation in two groups with a novel paradigm requiring the encoding of the kinematics of the right hand to produce the appropriate predictive force on the left hand.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Error based motor learning can be driven by both sensory prediction error and reward prediction error. Learning based on sensory prediction error is termed sensorimotor adaptation, while learning based on reward prediction error is termed reward learning. To investigate the characteristics and differences between sensorimotor adaptation and reward learning, we adapted a visuomotor paradigm where subjects performed arm movements while presented with either the sensory prediction error, signed end-point error, or binary reward.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Most individuals experience their dominant arm as being more dexterous than the non-dominant arm, but the neural mechanisms underlying this asymmetry in motor behaviour are unclear. Using a delayed-reach task, we have recently demonstrated strong goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex gains in the dominant upper limb of human participants. Here, we used an equivalent experimental paradigm to address the neural mechanisms that underlie the preparation for reaching movements with the non-dominant upper limb.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Motor adaptation to novel dynamics occurs rapidly using sensed errors to update the current motor memory. This adaption is strongly driven by proprioceptive and visual signals that indicate errors in the motor memory. Here, we extend this previous work by investigating whether the presence of additional visual cues could increase the rate of motor adaptation, specifically when the visual motion cue is congruent with the dynamics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Musculotendon parameters are key factors in the Hill-type muscle contraction dynamics, determining the muscle force estimation accuracy of a musculoskeletal model. Their values are mostly derived from muscle architecture datasets, whose emergence has been a major impetus for model development. However, it is often not clear if such parameter update indeed improves simulation accuracy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Voluntary movements are prepared before they are executed. Preparatory activity has been observed across the CNS and recently documented in first-order neurons of the human PNS (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Object manipulation often requires coordination between hands and adaption to the dynamic characteristics of the object. When manipulating the same object, the two hands can have either symmetric or asymmetric impact on the object's trajectory. In this work, we used a bimanual manipulation task of a complex object with internal dynamics to examine how symmetric or scaled-down control of one of the hands affects the coordination between hands.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Humans have unrivalled abilities to perform dexterous object manipulation. This requires the sensorimotor system to quickly adapt to environmental changes and predictively counter act the external disturbances. Many studies have focused on the anticipatory control of digits with real-world experiments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

During object manipulation, our sensorimotor sys-tem needs to represent the objects dynamics in order to better control it. This is especially important in the case of grip force control where small forces can cause the object to slip from our fingers, and excessive forces can cause fatigue or even damage the object. While the tradeoff between these two constraints is clear for stable objects, such as lifting a soda can, it is less clear how the sensorimotor system adjusts the grip force for unstable objects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The separation of distinct motor memories by contextual cues is a well known and well studied phenomenon of feedforward human motor control. However, there is no clear evidence of such context-induced separation in feedback control. Here we test both experimentally and computationally if context-dependent switching of feedback controllers is possible in the human motor system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Learning new movement patterns is a normal part of daily life, but of critical importance in both sport and rehabilitation. A major question is how different sensory signals are integrated together to give rise to motor adaptation and learning. More specifically, there is growing evidence that pain can give rise to alterations in the learning process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The perception of our body in space is flexible and manipulable. The predictive brain hypothesis explains this malleability as a consequence of the interplay between incoming sensory information and our body expectations. However, given the interaction between perception and action, we might also expect that actions would arise due to prediction errors, especially in conflicting situations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Switching between motor tasks requires accurate adjustments for changes in dynamics (grasping a cup) or sensorimotor transformations (moving a computer mouse). Dual-adaptation studies have investigated how learning of context-dependent dynamics or transformations is enabled by sensory cues. However, certain cues, such as color, have shown mixed results.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Monitoring of finger manipulation without disturbing the inherent functionalities is critical to understand the sense of natural touch. However, worn or attached sensors affect the natural feeling of the skin. We developed nanomesh pressure sensors that can monitor finger pressure without detectable effects on human sensation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The timescales of adaptation to novel dynamics are well explained by a dual-rate model with slow and fast states. This model can predict interference, savings and spontaneous recovery, but cannot account for adaptation to multiple tasks, as each new task drives unlearning of the previously learned task. Nevertheless, in the presence of appropriate contextual cues, humans are able to adapt simultaneously to opposing dynamics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Visuomotor feedback responses vary in intensity throughout a reach, commonly explained by optimal control. Here, we show that the optimal control for a range of movements with the same goal can be simplified to a time-to-target dependent control scheme. We measure our human participants' visuomotor responses in five reaching conditions, each with different hand or cursor kinematics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In our daily life we often make complex actions comprised of linked movements, such as reaching for a cup of coffee and bringing it to our mouth to drink. Recent work has highlighted the role of such linked movements in the formation of independent motor memories, affecting the learning rate and ability to learn opposing force fields. In these studies, distinct prior movements (lead-in movements) allow adaptation of opposing dynamics on the following movement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this study we experimentally test and model the control behavior of human participants when controlling inverted pendulums of different dynamic lengths, and with visual feedback of varying congruence to these dynamic lengths. Participants were asked to stabilize the inverted pendulum of L = 1 m and L = 4 m, with visual feedback shown at various distances along the pendulum. We fit a family of linear models to the control input (cart velocity) applied by participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Successful manipulation of objects requires forming internal representations of the object dynamics. To do so, the sensorimotor system uses visual feedback of the object movement allowing us to estimate the object state and build the representation. One way to investigate this mechanism is by introducing a discrepancy between the visual feedback about the object's movement and the actual movement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF