Publications by authors named "Dashan Mi"

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), a widely-utilized additive manufacturing (AM) technology, has found significant favor among automotive manufacturers. Polypropylene (PP) compound is extensively employed in the production of automotive parts due to its superior mechanical properties and formability. However, aiming at the problem of poor dimensional accuracy of pure PP parts, the quality of products can be enhanced by optimizing the combination of processing parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article introduces a one-step extrusion-based fused deposition modeling (FDM) approach for the challenging separation of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) during recycling. A shear screw printer (SSP) with shear elements was designed, and it was compared to a conventional single-screw printer (CSP) to investigate the differences in print stability, degradation levels, tensile performance, molecular orientation, and crystallization when preparing recycled PP and recycled PET blends. Although the retention effect of the SSP screw slightly increases the degradation of the blended rPP/rPET, the strong shear (2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Shear and thermal processing can greatly influence nanoparticles' orientation and dispersion, affecting the nanocomposites' conductivity and mechanical properties. The synergistic effects of shear flow and Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) nucleating ability on the crystallization mechanisms have been proven. In this study, Polylactic acid/Carbon nanotubes (PLA/CNTs) nanocomposites were produced by three different molding methods: compression molding (CM), conventional injection molding (IM), and interval injection molding (IntM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The orientation and dispersion of nanoparticles can greatly influence the conductivity and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. In this study, the Polypropylene/ Carbon Nanotubes (PP/CNTs) nanocomposites were produced using three different molding methods, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Morphological evolution under shear, during different injection processes, is an important issue in the phase morphology control, electrical conductivity, and physical properties of immiscible polymer blends. In the current work, conductive nanocomposites were produced through three different injection-molding methods, namely, conventional injection molding, multi-flow vibration injection molding (MFVIM), and pressure vibration injection molding (PVIM). Carbon nanotubes in the polyamide (PA) phase and the morphology of the PA phase were controlled by various injection methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main goal of this research is to study the development of crystalline morphology and compare it to various mechanical properties of microfibrillar composites (MFCs) based on polypropylene (PP) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), by adding a functional compatibilizer and a non-functional rubber in two different steps in the processing sequence. The MFCs were prepared at a weight ratio of 80/20 PP/PET by twin screw extrusion followed by cold drawing and injection moulding. The non-functionalized polyolefin-based elastomer (POE) and the functional compatibilizer (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improving the mechanical properties of immiscible PP/PET blend is of practical significance especially in the recycling process of multi-layered plastic solid waste. In this work, a multi-flow vibration injection molding technology (MFVIM) was hired to convert the crystalline morphology of the PP matrix from spherulite into shish-kebab. POE⁻⁻MA was added as compatibilizer, and results showed that the compatibilization effect consisted in the formation of a core-shell structure by dispersing the POE⁻⁻MA into the PP matrix to encapsulate the PET.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In situ microfibrillation and multiflow vibrate injection molding (MFVIM) technologies were combined to control the phase morphology of blended polypropylene (PP) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), wherein PP is the majority phase. Four kinds of phase structures were formed using different processing methods. As the PET content changes, the best choice of phase structure also changes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF