The study compares the healthcare and societal costs of two methods for fixing metacarpal and phalangeal fractures: intramedullary screw (IMS) and plate fixation in Australia.
Plate fixation was found to be more time-consuming, expensive, and required longer follow-up compared to IMS, leading to increased costs in both public and private healthcare systems.
Overall, IMS fixation resulted in significant savings for both the healthcare system and patients, highlighting its cost-effectiveness for treating these types of fractures.