Leveraging observed soil heterotrophic respiration fluxes as a novel constraint on global-scale models.

Microbially explicit models may improve understanding and projections of carbon dynamics in response to future climate change, but their fidelity in simulating global-scale soil heterotrophic respiration (R ), a stringent test for soil biogeochemical models, has never been evaluated. We used statistical global R products, as well as 7821 daily site-scale R measurements, to evaluate the spatiotemporal performance of one first-order decay model (CASA-CNP) and two microbially explicit biogeochemical models (CORPSE and MIMICS) that were forced by two different input datasets. CORPSE and MIMICS did not provide any measurable performance improvement; instead, the models were highly sensitive to the input data used to drive them.