Stress in the social environment: behavioural and social consequences of stress transmission in bird flocks.

The stress response helps individuals cope with challenges, yet how individual stress levels shape group-level processes and the behaviour of other group members has rarely been explored. In social groups, stress responses can be buffered by others or transmitted to members that have not even experienced the stressor first-hand. Stress transmission, in particular, can have profound consequences for the dynamics of social groups and the fitness of individuals therein.

The contribution of movement to social network structure and spreading dynamics under simple and complex transmission.

The structure of social networks fundamentally influences spreading dynamics. In general, the more contact between individuals, the more opportunity there is for the transmission of information or disease to take place. Yet, contact between individuals, and any resulting transmission events, are determined by a combination of spatial (where individuals choose to move) and social rules (who they choose to interact with or learn from).

Collective intelligence facilitates emergent resource partitioning through frequency-dependent learning.

Deciding where to forage must not only account for variations in habitat quality but also where others might forage. Recent studies have suggested that when individuals remember recent foraging outcomes, negative frequency-dependent learning can allow them to avoid resources exploited by others (indirect competition). This process can drive the emergence of consistent differences in resource use (resource partitioning) at the population level.

Testing the information centre hypothesis in a multilevel society.

In various animal species conspecifics aggregate at sleeping sites. Such aggregations can act as information centres where individuals acquire up-to-date knowledge about their environment. In some species, communal sleeping sites comprise individuals from multiple groups, where each group maintains stable membership over time.

The relative contribution of acoustic signals versus movement cues in group coordination and collective decision-making.

To benefit from group living, individuals need to maintain cohesion and coordinate their activities. Effective communication thus becomes critical, facilitating rapid coordination of behaviours and reducing consensus costs when group members have differing needs and information. In many bird and mammal species, collective decisions rely on acoustic signals in some contexts but on movement cues in others.

Experimental manipulation of food availability and macroparasite prevalence reveal differential effects on space use in wild rodents.

Research Highlight: Mistrick, J., Veitch, J. S.

Social restructuring during harsh environmental conditions promotes cooperative behaviour in a songbird.

Cooperation may emerge from intrinsic factors such as social structure and extrinsic factors such as environmental conditions. Although these factors might reinforce or counteract each other, their interaction remains unexplored in animal populations. Studies on multilevel societies suggest a link between social structure, environmental conditions and individual investment in cooperative behaviours.

Natal legacies cause social and spatial marginalization during dispersal.

Early-life experiences can drive subsequent variation in social behaviours, but how differences among individuals emerge remains unknown. We combined experimental manipulations with GPS-tracking to investigate the pathways through which developmental conditions affect social network position during the early dispersal of wild red kites (Milvus milvus). Across 211 juveniles from 140 broods, last-hatched chicks-the least competitive-had the fewest number of peer encounters after fledging.

Modelling animal social networks: New solutions and future directions.

Research Highlight: Ross, C. T., McElreath, R.

Compromise or choose: shared movement decisions in wild vulturine guineafowl.

Shared-decision making is beneficial for the maintenance of group-living. However, little is known about whether consensus decision-making follows similar processes across different species. Addressing this question requires robust quantification of how individuals move relative to each other.

Variation in local population size predicts social network structure in wild songbirds.

The structure of animal societies is a key determinant of many ecological and evolutionary processes. Yet, we know relatively little about the factors and mechanisms that underpin detailed social structure. Among other factors, social structure can be influenced by habitat configuration.

Group-level differences in social network structure remain repeatable after accounting for environmental drivers.

Individuals show consistent between-individual behavioural variation when they interact with conspecifics or heterospecifics. Such patterns might underlie emergent group-specific behavioural patterns and between-group behavioural differences. However, little is known about (i) how social and non-social drivers (external drivers) shape group-level social structures and (ii) whether animal groups show consistent between-group differences in social structure after accounting for external drivers.

Multilevel social structure predicts individual helping responses in a songbird.

Multilevel societies are formed when stable groups of individuals spatially overlap and associate preferentially with other groups, producing a hierarchical social structure. Once thought to be exclusive to humans and large mammals, these complex societies have recently been described in birds. However, it remains largely unclear what benefits individuals gain by forming multilevel societies.

Challenges of mismatching timescales in longitudinal studies of collective behaviour.

How individuals' prior experience and population evolutionary history shape emergent patterns in animal collectives remains a major gap in the study of collective behaviour. One reason for this is that the processes that can shape individual contributions to collective actions can happen over very different timescales from each other and from the collective actions themselves, resulting in mismatched timescales. For example, a preference to move towards a specific patch might arise from phenotype, memory or physiological state.

Foraging synchrony drives resilience in human-dolphin mutualism.

Interactions between humans and nature have profound consequences, which rarely are mutually beneficial. Further, behavioral and environmental changes can turn human-wildlife cooperative interactions into conflicts, threatening their continued existence. By tracking fine-scale behavioral interactions between artisanal fishers and wild dolphins targeting migratory mullets, we reveal that foraging synchrony is key to benefiting both predators.

Behavioural ecology at the spatial-social interface.

Spatial and social behaviour are fundamental aspects of an animal's biology, and their social and spatial environments are indelibly linked through mutual causes and shared consequences. We define the 'spatial-social interface' as intersection of social and spatial aspects of individuals' phenotypes and environments. Behavioural variation at the spatial-social interface has implications for ecological and evolutionary processes including pathogen transmission, population dynamics, and the evolution of social systems.

Collective action in birds.

Observing the behaviour of others is a cheap and effective way of acquiring up-to-date information about the environment. Further, an animal that changes its behaviour in response to acquiring social information effectively propagates that information forwards. Although the rules that govern how individual birds detect and respond to social cues are often very simple, they are able to produce a diverse range of collective actions from which individuals can reap benefits that include predator avoidance and more accurate estimations of the environment.

Is bin-opening in cockatoos leading to an innovation arms race with humans?

Foraging innovations can give wild animals access to human-derived food sources. If these innovations spread, they can enable adaptive flexibility but also lead to human-wildlife conflicts. Examples include crop-raiding elephants and long-tailed macaques that steal items from people to trade them back for food.

A new method for characterising shared space use networks using animal trapping data.

Abstract: Studying the social behaviour of small or cryptic species often relies on constructing networks from sparse point-based observations of individuals (e.g. live trapping data).

The performance of field sampling for parasite detection in a wild passerine.

Parasites can impact the behavior of animals and alter the interplay with ecological factors in their environment. Studying the effects that parasites have on animals thus requires accurate estimates of infections in individuals. However, quantifying parasites can be challenging due to several factors.

Permutation tests for hypothesis testing with animal social network data: Problems and potential solutions.

Permutation tests are widely used to test null hypotheses with animal social network data, but suffer from high rates of type I and II error when the permutations do not properly simulate the intended null hypothesis.Two common types of permutations each have limitations. Pre-network (or datastream) permutations can be used to control 'nuisance effects' like spatial, temporal or sampling biases, but only when the null hypothesis assumes random social structure.

Using optimal foraging theory to infer how groups make collective decisions.

Studying animal behavior as collective phenomena is a powerful tool for understanding social processes, including group coordination and decision-making. However, linking individual behavior during group decision-making to the preferences underlying those actions poses a considerable challenge. Optimal foraging theory, and specifically the marginal value theorem (MVT), can provide predictions about individual preferences, against which the behavior of groups can be compared under different models of influence.

Collective behaviour: Jackdaws vote to leave with their voice.

Making a decision as a group requires not only choosing where to go but also when to go. A new study provides experimental evidence that, in jackdaws, vocalisations facilitate synchronous early morning departures from communal roosts.

The social transmission of stress in animal collectives.

The stress systems are powerful mediators between the organism's systemic dynamic equilibrium and changes in its environment beyond the level of anticipated fluctuations. Over- or under-activation of the stress systems' responses can impact an animal's health, survival and reproductive success. While physiological stress responses and their influence on behaviour and performance are well understood at the individual level, it remains largely unknown whether-and how-stressed individuals can affect the stress systems of other group members, and consequently their collective behaviour.