Publications by authors named "Dale Mitani"

Purpose: This article describes the qualitative analysis of goal achievement by oncology nurses who attended a gero-oncology course.

Participants & Setting: Four annual programs were completed and included 140 teams of oncology nurses from cancer settings across the United States.

Methodologic Approach: Self-determination theory and achievement goal theory provided the conceptual framework for understanding what motivates people to achieve goals and how goals can measure outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Oncology nurses are key in caring for older adults with cancer, but few have received specialized training in gerontology. To address this, a geriatric oncology curriculum was developed for oncology nurses.

Materials & Methods: The Geriatric Oncology Workshop (GrOW) was developed and delivered to oncology nurses (n = 387) from 2016 to 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Older adults (65+) with cancer are at greater risk for hospital readmissions, making it crucial to identify their risk factors for better prevention strategies.
  • A study reviewed data from patients discharged between 2006-2011, focusing on factors like functional status, laboratory values, and comorbidities to analyze readmission risks.
  • Findings revealed that patients with 2 or more abnormal lab results (like hemoglobin or sodium) at discharge were 3 times more likely to be readmitted within 30 days, highlighting the need for close monitoring of these values before discharge to potentially prevent readmissions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and validity of a computer-based geriatric assessment via two methods of electronic data capture ( SupportScreen and REDCap) compared with paper-and-pencil data capture among older adults with cancer.

Methods: Eligible patients were ≥ 65 years old, had a cancer diagnosis, and were fluent in English. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four arms, in which they completed the geriatric assessment twice: (1) REDCap and paper and pencil in sessions 1 and 2; (2) REDCap in both sessions; (3) SupportScreen and paper and pencil in sessions 1 and 2; and (4) SupportScreen in both sessions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF