Characteristics of responders and nonresponders to brief-pulse right unilateral ECT in a controlled clinical trial.

In a double-blind, randomized controlled study of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with major depression, 7 of the 17 patients allocated to the right unilateral group failed to respond to treatment. The nonresponders were subsequently openly treated with bitemporal treatment, which produced an acceptable outcome in these cases of right unilateral treatment failure. This paper describes the clinical outcome, electrophysiological characteristics (impedence, estimated seizure threshold, and change in threshold), and the degree to which stimuli exceeded threshold in the responder and nonresponder groups.

Electrical dose and seizure threshold: relations to clinical outcome and cognitive effects in bifrontal, bitemporal, and right unilateral ECT.

In patients allocated blindly and randomly to receive bitemporal, right unilateral, or bifrontal electroconvulsive therapy, seizure length, electrophysiologic characteristics (dynamic impedance, seizure threshold, and changes in threshold), and the degree of suprathreshold stimulation were recorded. The relations of these variables to clinical outcome and cognitive effects were determined. There were no differences in seizure length between groups, and there were no significant correlations between seizure length and any measure of clinical response.

Therapeutic advantage of bifrontal electrode placement in ECT.

Fifty-nine patients suffering from a major depressive episode, for whom electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was clinically indicated, were randomly assigned to one of three electrode placement groups for treatment with brief pulse, threshold-level ECT: bitemporal (BT), right unilateral (RU) or bifrontal (BF). Comparison of these groups in terms of number of treatments, duration of treatment, or incidence of treatment failure, showed that the bilateral placements were superior to the unilateral; comparison of Hamilton, Montgomery-Asberg, and visual analogue scale scores showed that the bifrontal placement was superior to both bitemporal and unilateral treatment. Bitemporal treatment showed therapeutic results intermediate between BF and RU.